Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie E.)

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

Didn't think of it that way. Alonso appeared to be very much the outsider in terms of drivers by the Hungarian GP (no idea if that was of his own making or due to his team mate being a McLaren product/protege) so I imagine that Briatore would be the only one that would listen and not send him packing.

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

Are we really giving any credibility to someone claiming that Alonso did ask Ron Dennis to sabotage his protege from 10+ years? I am talking of the "make sure he runs out of fuel" bit in a different part of the book.
We know from his own mouth that Alonso thought that Ron Dennis (or McLaren as a whole) was favoring Hamilton over him and he has acknowledged to feeling a bit paranoid about that. The fact that he was already feeling disfavored before Monaco is what made the whole incident snowball so big.
It all sounds a bit ridiculous, IMHO.
Rivals, not enemies. (Now paraphrased from A. Newey).

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

hollus wrote:Are we really giving any credibility to someone claiming that Alonso did ask Ron Dennis to sabotage his protege from 10+ years? I am talking of the "make sure he runs out of fuel" bit in a different part of the book.
We know from his own mouth that Alonso thought that Ron Dennis (or McLaren as a whole) was favoring Hamilton over him and he has acknowledged to feeling a bit paranoid about that. The fact that he was already feeling disfavored before Monaco is what made the whole incident snowball so big.
It all sounds a bit ridiculous, IMHO.
I can readily believe it as an emotional outburst, less so if it was more considered. But yes I can see him asking for that. He had just been stripped of pole position, and he was struggling to reconcile the fact that he was being beaten on track by Hamilton. Alonso, like most World Champions, thinks he's the best thing since sliced bread and cannot be beaten unless the odds are stacked against him. That is where his paranoia came from - he simply could not compute that anyone was capable of beating him in equal machinery and put it down to the team sabotaging his chances rather than entertain the thought that Hamilton was equalling and beating him on merit.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

I can believe Alonso asking for Hamilton's car to be underfuelled. Hell, he's probably even suggested a team mate crash at some point too...
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

andrew wrote:Didn't think of it that way. Alonso appeared to be very much the outsider in terms of drivers by the Hungarian GP (no idea if that was of his own making or due to his team mate being a McLaren product/protege) so I imagine that Briatore would be the only one that would listen and not send him packing.
The other way to look at it is to say:

* Alonso was one of the central characters in 'spygate', actively discussing the information with de la Rosa.
* He knew all along about the incriminating emails.
* He hid them from his teams internal investigation, or at least did not draw attention to them.
+ He discussed them with Briatore.
+ He negotiated with Mosley so that he would receive immunity.
+ Mosley manipulated the sequence of events in order to nail McLaren and Dennis.
* He hid them from the first FIA trial.
+ Mosley conspired with this.
* He tried to blackmail Dennis into favouring him for the championship.
+ This suggests that a deal was in place with Mosley at this time to not pursue the matter yet (possibly waiting until after the season had finished so as to not harm Alonso's championship chances).
* After his blackmail attempt, Alonso again spoke to Mosley and pulled the trigger.
* McLaren received a record fine because Alonso witheld information from the team that he later gave to the FIA.

For me the *'d items are more or less uncontested (although they're subject to my presentation of them), the +'s are the contentious items that I believe have a reasonably high chance of being true but we're never likely to find out for sure.

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

myurr wrote:
hollus wrote:Are we really giving any credibility to someone claiming that Alonso did ask Ron Dennis to sabotage his protege from 10+ years? I am talking of the "make sure he runs out of fuel" bit in a different part of the book.
We know from his own mouth that Alonso thought that Ron Dennis (or McLaren as a whole) was favoring Hamilton over him and he has acknowledged to feeling a bit paranoid about that. The fact that he was already feeling disfavored before Monaco is what made the whole incident snowball so big.
It all sounds a bit ridiculous, IMHO.
I can readily believe it as an emotional outburst, less so if it was more considered. But yes I can see him asking for that. He had just been stripped of pole position, and he was struggling to reconcile the fact that he was being beaten on track by Hamilton. Alonso, like most World Champions, thinks he's the best thing since sliced bread and cannot be beaten unless the odds are stacked against him. That is where his paranoia came from - he simply could not compute that anyone was capable of beating him in equal machinery and put it down to the team sabotaging his chances rather than entertain the thought that Hamilton was equalling and beating him on merit.
So, if you think the team (Ron) is sabotaging your chances, it makes perfect logical sense to ask Ron (the team) to sabotage your teammate instead...
Rivals, not enemies. (Now paraphrased from A. Newey).

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

I think from Alonso's perspective, that's all correct - and it's fairly easy for me to put myself in Alonso's shoes and understand why he saw things the way he did, and why he said and did the things he did. But of course, understanding isn't the same as condoning.

The same is true for the other side of the garage. Hamilton was young and immature, and he suddenly found himself in a position to be a rookie world champ. Looking at it all from his perspective, I can understand his actions as well. But that doesn't mean he wasn't a total jerk to Alonso and the team at Monaco and Hungary, and probably plenty of other times, too.

The situation was a total clusterf*ck at McLaren from a driver's standpoint, and frankly I think Dennis and Whitmarsh quickly found themselves in a minefield with nowhere to go. On the one hand, Alonso felt Hamilton was being favored; while on the other, Max was investigating McLaren for favoring Alonso. It was just a crazy situation after Monaco.

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

myurr wrote:
andrew wrote:Didn't think of it that way. Alonso appeared to be very much the outsider in terms of drivers by the Hungarian GP (no idea if that was of his own making or due to his team mate being a McLaren product/protege) so I imagine that Briatore would be the only one that would listen and not send him packing.
The other way to look at it is to say:

* Alonso was one of the central characters in 'spygate', actively discussing the information with de la Rosa.
* He knew all along about the incriminating emails.
* He hid them from his teams internal investigation, or at least did not draw attention to them.
+ He discussed them with Briatore.
+ He negotiated with Mosley so that he would receive immunity.
+ Mosley manipulated the sequence of events in order to nail McLaren and Dennis.
* He hid them from the first FIA trial.
+ Mosley conspired with this.
* He tried to blackmail Dennis into favouring him for the championship.
+ This suggests that a deal was in place with Mosley at this time to not pursue the matter yet (possibly waiting until after the season had finished so as to not harm Alonso's championship chances).
* After his blackmail attempt, Alonso again spoke to Mosley and pulled the trigger.
* McLaren received a record fine because Alonso witheld information from the team that he later gave to the FIA.

For me the *'d items are more or less uncontested (although they're subject to my presentation of them), the +'s are the contentious items that I believe have a reasonably high chance of being true but we're never likely to find out for sure.
What a load of baseless pure speculation tripe. The whole situation in Macca 2007 was messed up. Macca did favor Lewis so Fernando fought back(in a crappy way, no doubt. I don' tcondone his actions.), but everybody acted childishly(Dennis, Alonso, Hamilton) all through the season.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

nipo
nipo
0
Joined: 30 Jul 2009, 04:45
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

@hollus

Well I think we've seen enough things about Alonso and for me those things stack up pretty well to suggest he could certainly ask for something like sobotaging his teammate. Maybe in anger and he didn't really mean it, as I pointed out in my previous post, but sure as hell possible.

That being said I'm very open and ready to accept this as a thing being bloated by the book to attract attention. Personally I'm not gonna put this into the list of reasons why I dislike Alonso, unless it is proven in the future that he did deliberately and concretely ask for the sabotage.

fausto cedros's post (in this thread, page 2) first pointed us to this "leak" from the "No Angel" book. We haven't seen details (like who the book says the source is, how the lines were exactly spoken, etc.). It'd be interesting to know more about how the book reveals this information. Anyone with the book care to shed some more light?

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

Pierce89 wrote:What a load of baseless pure speculation tripe. The whole situation in Macca 2007 was messed up. Macca did favor Lewis so Fernando fought back(in a crappy way, no doubt. I don' tcondone his actions.), but everybody acted childishly(Dennis, Alonso, Hamilton) all through the season.
Not all of that can be tripe as some of it forms the basis of the trial that ended with McLaren receiving a $100m fine for witholding evidence - namely Alonso's email evidence. So care to point out which bits are tripe and which are correct, or give your 100% accurate account?

Can you also back up your suggestion that McLaren did favour Lewis? How so exactly?

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

myurr wrote: Can you also back up your suggestion that McLaren did favour Lewis? How so exactly?

noooooooo

please don't

[-o<

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

:lol:

I agree - let's leave it at 'Aonso felt McLaren were favoring Lewis'. It saves a lot of hyperbole from either side that way.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

Pup wrote::lol:

I agree - let's leave it at 'Aonso felt McLaren were favoring Lewis'. It saves a lot of hyperbole from either side that way.
... and McLaren felt they were being equal to both.


We don't need to speculate about what Max Moseley felt, we've seen the pictures.

gridwalker
gridwalker
7
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 12:22
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

richard_leeds wrote:We don't need to speculate about what Max Moseley felt, we've seen the pictures.
Probably a lot better than most people realise ;)
"Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine ..."

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Spygate, again (from No Angel: The Secret Life of Bernie

Post

myurr wrote:Can you also back up your suggestion that McLaren did favour Lewis? How so exactly?
It's pretty obvious they were but lets not get into it. Fun though it is, it is sadly off topic. :lol: