![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
No. The two sides are definitely different. You can draw perspective lines across the car to prove it.Just_a_fan wrote:It's an optical illusion caused by the angle that the inner end of the flaps is cut relative to the longitudinal axis of the car. Look at the wing from the front or above and you will see the angle.
No, they're the same. Feel free to draw perspective lines but you can guarantee they'll be inaccurate. You're trying to look at a 3d curved surface in a 2d picture, your eyes are playing tricks on you.JB2011 wrote:No. The two sides are definitely different. You can draw perspective lines across the car to prove it.Just_a_fan wrote:It's an optical illusion caused by the angle that the inner end of the flaps is cut relative to the longitudinal axis of the car. Look at the wing from the front or above and you will see the angle.
It's about the wing on THE CAR! If we split everything off, then there is absolutely nothing left in the car threads worth discussing. Do you have anything productive to add?Diesel wrote:Moderator, can you split this wing talk in to another topic? It's really quite pointless...
Given their experience with KERS in 2009, I think that's one area in which the MP4-26 will be at the head of the field.Shrieker wrote:Have McLaren been testing their KERS these last 2 tests ? I saw nothing about that (I might have missed completely). If they haven't... Well, then. The future looks even more bleak for them
We are not always in here reading all the threads. We assume most is OK, and we check for reports on the moderation control panel.Diesel wrote:Moderator, can you split this wing talk in to another topic? It's really quite pointless...
So did Mercedes, think that will be mostly to protect it from easily created damage in the wet.wesley123 wrote:went back to the older front wing too