I'm not sure what all the complaining is about. Maybe people just like complaining for the sake of complaining? I felt Canada was an exciting race, that required strategy. Why are there rules about using multiple compounds? The only reason you'd need that rule is if the tires didn't wear, like last year. If you can do the entire race on one set, then no one would ever need to pit. Having tires that wear enough that 2-3 pit stops are needed adds to the strategy and sport of racing. Could we have F1 with no pit stops at all? Easily with last year's tires and the ban on refueling. But part of F1 is the pit strategy. Just an opinion...everyone's got their own take.ringo wrote:I remember before the pirellis came.
Everyone wanted tyres that degrade so badly. " Canada 2010 every race!!"
"it will improve racing", " the best drivers will nurse the tyres and use their brains" yadda yadda. All clap trap.
Actually Pirelli have already said that they're open to supplying more sets of tyres at each GP. Surely even with the cost of shipping them around the place that would be a much lower cost than compound development and additional testing.WhiteBlue wrote:If the tyres degrade as fast as some people fear and the impact on qualifying is as bad as we hear I expect a big demand for additional sets of tyres by the teams. As that would be a cost factor nobody has planned for we shall probably see a compound modification program soon. Atm this scenario is speculative but possible.
Can you give a source for that? I have read that there will be additional sets for development purposes during Friday running at least at the Malaysian event. But a commitment to a general increase of supply for Q1-Q3 and the race must have escaped my attention.myurr wrote:Actually Pirelli have already said that they're open to supplying more sets of tyres at each GP. Surely even with the cost of shipping them around the place that would be a much lower cost than compound development and additional testing.WhiteBlue wrote:If the tyres degrade as fast as some people fear and the impact on qualifying is as bad as we hear I expect a big demand for additional sets of tyres by the teams. As that would be a cost factor nobody has planned for we shall probably see a compound modification program soon. Atm this scenario is speculative but possible.
Not off hand unfortunately. It was in an autosport interview at some point in the last few weeks, but beyond that I've got nothing and haven't the time today to go look it upWhiteBlue wrote:Can you give a source for that? I have read that there will be additional sets for development purposes during Friday running at least at the Malaysian event. But a commitment to a general increase of supply for Q1-Q3 and the race must have escaped my attention.myurr wrote:Actually Pirelli have already said that they're open to supplying more sets of tyres at each GP. Surely even with the cost of shipping them around the place that would be a much lower cost than compound development and additional testing.
So if I'm reading the sarcasm correctly, you would be a fan of tires that last the entire race (currently available technology) and thusly no pit stops?G-Rock wrote:I wonder if teams could design wheel bearings to wear out as well. A "thinking" driver would have to manage brake heat and cornering speeds to make the bearings last till the end.
If the wheel is in danger of falling off, a tether could keep the wheel assembly from buggering off.
They could used colour coded diagrams on the television feed so the viewer could watch bearing degration so the viewer doesn't fall asleep due to a lack of passing/crashes....
There is an argument for that to happen although I'd say the tyre should be made marginal if that were the case.volarchico wrote: So if I'm reading the sarcasm correctly, you would be a fan of tires that last the entire race (currently available technology) and thusly no pit stops?
Wouldn't that lead to a simple parade of cars going around for many laps? No one would attempt to pass because if they worked their tires harder than the guy behind them and didn't make the move stick, then they'd get passed because their tires were shot. It's a tricky situation. Ideally (for the fans at least), we'd have two different cars with very similar capabilities that they would be able to pass each other back-and-forth all throughout the race never leading to a dull moment! And think of all the people we'd put out of work if pit-stops were banned?Just_a_fan wrote:There is an argument for that to happen although I'd say the tyre should be made marginal if that were the case.