He was definitely using it on his penultimate lap so I would imagine he was using it on his final fastest lap as well. He was able to activate it very early on the exit of some of those corners, definitely before the car was straight. They have good downforce on that car.Onch wrote:Anyone seen Hamilton's DRS activated on his last qualy lap?
I have seen him coming into and exiting of the last corner and at no point did I see the rear flap move...
Funny I had no idea and I am incapable of performing such an act anyways.Poleman wrote:Source?...tok-tokkie wrote:I am pleased to report that he has been chucked out the pub (banned).
Compared to some other cars, the MP4-26 DRS is hard to see activate (at least on my crappy non-HD 384x288 online feed) because of the relative size of the main plane and the flap. The flap is so large, it doesn't seem to have much motion.Onch wrote:Anyone seen Hamilton's DRS activated on his last qualy lap?
I have seen him coming into and exiting of the last corner and at no point did I see the rear flap move...
Errr that most successful driver was 6 tenths off his team mates pace... He used to be a great driver, but I haven't seen him looking comfortable in that car since his return. Maybe he'll do better in the race as the rears start to go away and the cars become more oversteery.andrew wrote:Good to see HRT in but what the hell are Merc playing at?! Do they realise they have the most successful F1 driver in one of thier cars? Just pitiful.
I'm not so sure. I think McLaren are making better use of their KERS system so the gap could be larger to Red Bull if that's out of the equation.myurr wrote:While a dry race would be great because we will get a better idea of the pecking order and how important or not qualifying pace is, a wet race would be pretty exciting as well. In the wet I think McLaren may have the measure of Red Bull as they're allegedly running more downforce and their car looks so stable and predictable.
So I guess I'm going to be pretty happy either way
Pretty sure at this point the McLaren has more downforce – they were roughly equal to the RBRs in sector 1, marginally faster in 3, and about a tenth faster in sector 2 (except vettel's pole lap). Give that sector 2 has all the high downforce turns in bar 12, that's a pretty clear indication of where they're strong.Tumbarello wrote:I'm not so sure. I think McLaren are making better use of their KERS system so the gap could be larger to Red Bull if that's out of the equation.myurr wrote:While a dry race would be great because we will get a better idea of the pecking order and how important or not qualifying pace is, a wet race would be pretty exciting as well. In the wet I think McLaren may have the measure of Red Bull as they're allegedly running more downforce and their car looks so stable and predictable.
So I guess I'm going to be pretty happy either way
I don't get it, if they were quicker in all sectors, why are they behind?beelsebob wrote:Pretty sure at this point the McLaren has more downforce – they were roughly equal to the RBRs in sector 1, marginally faster in 3, and about a tenth faster in sector 2 (except vettel's pole lap). Give that sector 2 has all the high downforce turns in bar 12, that's a pretty clear indication of where they're strong.Tumbarello wrote:I'm not so sure. I think McLaren are making better use of their KERS system so the gap could be larger to Red Bull if that's out of the equation.myurr wrote:While a dry race would be great because we will get a better idea of the pecking order and how important or not qualifying pace is, a wet race would be pretty exciting as well. In the wet I think McLaren may have the measure of Red Bull as they're allegedly running more downforce and their car looks so stable and predictable.
So I guess I'm going to be pretty happy either way