so put them on the right time and try to manage them better. that's my view.andrew wrote:It is artifical as passing should be done on the track, not in the pitlane with the aid of tyres with a ridiculously high rate of degredation.
so put them on the right time and try to manage them better. that's my view.andrew wrote:It is artifical as passing should be done on the track, not in the pitlane with the aid of tyres with a ridiculously high rate of degredation.
What the hell? When did Hamilton weave? And why the hell does Alonso deserve to be penalised for something that affected him far worse than it did Hamilton?Fil wrote:Alonso & Hamilton both penalised 20sec! 1 for collision, the other for weaving when being passed..
Hasn't affected Fred at all in 6th, whilst Lewis drops behind Kobayashi for 8th now.
Time to argue this one over ppl.. (I'm betting 3 new threads due to this)
Personally, both didn't deserve a penalty. Let them race & make mistakes. Alonso only hurt his own race, and Lewis screwed his own pace due to the rear damage. That's penalty enough.
now becomes:Andrea Stella wrote:He WAS second, he IS second. That's really unfair, so like no penalty.
Andy Latham wrote:He WAS sixth, he IS sixth. That's really unfair, so like no penalty.
I don't understand that chart. Button's is a flat line at 0s. How do you read that thing and what is it graphing?kakogohrena wrote:Hamilton vs Buttonrace history graf