The Briton added that he had been encouraged by how close McLaren had got to Red Bull in Malaysia, but suspected that this may have been due to Red Bull losing pace rather than McLaren gaining it.
"I think the performance we had in the first and second stints was good, and if I hadn't been stuck behind [Nick] Heidfeld I would have been able to keep very close behind Sebastian [Vettel] and fight at the pitstops.
"Normally you have to open up the cooling, which loses downforce and efficiency. We didn't have to do that. Maybe others had to do that, maybe Red Bull, and in doing so I think they lost a bit of speed.
He used up too many sets in qualy and was stuck with used sets for the race. Out of the top 6, Vettel used up the least in qualifying, followed by Button.Alge7a wrote:i started this thread and quite rightly its been pointed out that Mclaren are on the pace. Im surpised by that. And was thrilled until Hamilton hit the cliff so dramatically on his used tyres. Why two sets of hards by the way? anyone? Still not worked that out, other than he ran out of softs.
I use LH for the first two stints and JB for the last two stints. I think that is a fair way to compare the pace of the Macca in Malaysia don't you think. Unless of course you believe that Jenson's pace is slower than the true pace of the car?raymondu999 wrote:There is no basis for pace comparison for Button VS Vettel. They've never even had a common teammate.
Yes, but Vettel is no slouch either. They have also never been teammates, nor have they had common teammates. If they had a common link by some weird "He's my ex teammate's ex teammate's ex teammates" thing I can't be bothered to think about it anymore as it confuses me too muchn smikle wrote:Oh that, hehe.. Button is no slouch you know. He is a tested driver who is fast as the fastest once his car is planted.