Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

djos wrote:
beelsebob wrote: The point being that Alonso was hot on his tail, and when asked to go faster, Alonso passed him. Webber had no more race pace today. All setting the quickest lap means is that Vettel (unusually) didn't turn it up for 1 lap at the end.
Webber was on used Primes and Alonso was on new primes when he got by Webber, the situation was reversed when Mark got by Fernando to cement his 2nd place.

Perhaps watch the race and the driver interviews next time!
No need to watch again – you're just not understanding the point – Webber was asked to go faster – he couldn't.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

beelsebob wrote:
djos wrote:
beelsebob wrote: The point being that Alonso was hot on his tail, and when asked to go faster, Alonso passed him. Webber had no more race pace today. All setting the quickest lap means is that Vettel (unusually) didn't turn it up for 1 lap at the end.
Webber was on used Primes and Alonso was on new primes when he got by Webber, the situation was reversed when Mark got by Fernando to cement his 2nd place.

Perhaps watch the race and the driver interviews next time!
No need to watch again – you're just not understanding the point – Webber was asked to go faster – he couldn't.
At that point in time due to his tires being older than Alonso's, however with new tires he did a 1.29.703 on lap 48 a full 2/10ths faster than what Seb did on lap 50 - the tires are the limiting factor here and this needs to be understood.
"In downforce we trust"

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

djos wrote:At that point in time due to his tires being older than Alonso's, however with new tires he did a 1.29.703 on lap 48 a full 2/10ths faster than what Seb did on lap 50 - the tires are the limiting factor here and this needs to be understood.
Absolutely the tyres were limiting him – the point was that Webber's race pace was about as fast as it could be – when asked to go faster he had nothing more, whether he was limited by tyres, skill, engine, downforce, or what, he could not go faster. Based on that, it's pretty reasonable to suggest that McLaren can at least keep up with Webber's pace (if they don't bugger up in oh so many ways), but that Vettel's ultimate pace is still probably a bit beyond them.

Tamburello
Tamburello
0
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 14:52
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

beelsebob wrote:
djos wrote:At that point in time due to his tires being older than Alonso's, however with new tires he did a 1.29.703 on lap 48 a full 2/10ths faster than what Seb did on lap 50 - the tires are the limiting factor here and this needs to be understood.
Absolutely the tyres were limiting him – the point was that Webber's race pace was about as fast as it could be – when asked to go faster he had nothing more, whether he was limited by tyres, skill, engine, downforce, or what, he could not go faster. Based on that, it's pretty reasonable to suggest that McLaren can at least keep up with Webber's pace (if they don't bugger up in oh so many ways), but that Vettel's ultimate pace is still probably a bit beyond them.
It's a lame argument. Webber overworked his tyres when fighting with Rosberg and Hamilton overcooked his tyres when he was fighting Button and co. So yes, Hamilton could have been "faster" but by the same reasoning, so could have Webber, thus maintaining the gap between them.

sriraj1031
sriraj1031
-1
Joined: 21 Feb 2008, 11:18

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

It's a lame argument. Webber overworked his tyres when fighting with Rosberg and Hamilton overcooked his tyres when he was fighting Button and co. So yes, Hamilton could have been "faster" but by the same reasoning, so could have Webber, thus maintaining the gap between them.
+1 to that, mclaren were messy in turkey and so were their drivers no doubt on that

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

komninosm wrote:I already called it on the tires I think, I agree with most.

BTW, where's the outrage for Massa's unsafe release and driving over the blue line. I recall certain little hypocrites here were up in arms when it was Hamilton doing it...
I agree somwhat. I expected there to be a thread of its own in the main forum crying "Ferrari preference". Honestly, since others have been penalised previously that release warranted it by those standards surely?

Then again...

User avatar
Hangaku
0
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 16:38
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

sriraj1031 wrote:+1 to that, mclaren were messy in turkey and so were their drivers no doubt on that
Thanks for your input, it's a great contribution :yawn:

As for the race, I thought it was ridiculous. It's not like watching F1 any more, it feels more like an unpredictable game show, where anything could happen at any moment, for seemingly no reason.

The tires go off far too fast, within one lap you can lose 2 seconds on your lap time, meaning ultimately you can't be RACEY if you want to be ahead, because you have to concede soon after.

There isn't enough difference between the hard and soft tires. Hard should last > 10 laps longer than they currently do, ofsetting the loss in lap times. At the minute, nobody wants to use them but they simply have to, which is nonsense.

There just isn't enough room (for the large majority) to have a different strategy and make it work. Vettel in this race was an exception, because he didn't have to be racey, but unless you were on the same strategy as everyone else, you lost out (Button).

DRS was a joke, overtaking was far too easy.
Yer.

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

ringo wrote:You seem to have selective amnesia every race you ask the same question and you get the same answers.
The BOSS moniker is similar to Prost being The Professor.

It's not a matter of what non hamilton fans think you see. It's what's he's doing to his teammates year in year out.

Would you rather TDG......... the driving god? :o :lol:
I just don't see what he is the boss of and have yet to see a suitable explanation. Prost being called the Professor was obvious. I have never been a fan of driver nicknames and would prefer proper names to be used to avoid confusion and I would certainly not call Hamilton the boss.

Pedro
Pedro
1
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 15:59

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

Pit-stop sumamry

Image


Stints

Image

yellow = soft; grey = hard tyre; star = unused, fresh set

Insomniac
Insomniac
0
Joined: 28 Jun 2010, 17:54

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

Pedro wrote:Pit-stop summary
Vettel's pit-stop times are just insane: 3.3, 2.8, 2.9 and 3.1. In a season where three or four pit-stops are common, you can really gain an edge over the competition in the time it takes to change tires, and RedBull knows this and dominates in this area. McLaren and Ferrari take note!

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

andrew wrote:
ringo wrote:You seem to have selective amnesia every race you ask the same question and you get the same answers.
The BOSS moniker is similar to Prost being The Professor.

It's not a matter of what non hamilton fans think you see. It's what's he's doing to his teammates year in year out.

Would you rather TDG......... the driving god? :o :lol:
I just don't see what he is the boss of and have yet to see a suitable explanation. Prost being called the Professor was obvious. I have never been a fan of driver nicknames and would prefer proper names to be used to avoid confusion and I would certainly not call Hamilton the boss.
He's the boss because when certain people ended up in the same team as him they expected to be able to boss the rookie around, and had quite the reverse happen.

vall
vall
0
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 21:31

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

where the "star = unused, fresh set" information comes from? Somebody claimed Fred overtook Webber because at the time Webber was on used hard and Fred on new, and later the situation was reversed and Webber overtook Fred. According to your statistics, only the second is correct.

It seems Fred overtook Webber on equal tires.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

vall wrote:where the "star = unused, fresh set" information comes from? Somebody claimed Fred overtook Webber because at the time Webber was on used hard and Fred on new, and later the situation was reversed and Webber overtook Fred. According to your statistics, only the second is correct.

It seems Fred overtook Webber on equal tires.
Mark did stop earlier than Alonso but Mark said:

I had a new set of prime tyres for my last stint,” says Mark, “and the car felt good. On lap 51 I got a run on Fernando in the DRS zone and we were side-by-side through Turns 12, 13 and 14.

I took that to mean he was on older tires for stint 3 but according to the graph Alonso had used tires for stint 4.
Last edited by djos on 09 May 2011, 13:22, edited 1 time in total.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
Hangaku
0
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 16:38
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

andrew wrote:I just don't see what he is the boss of and have yet to see a suitable explanation. Prost being called the Professor was obvious. I have never been a fan of driver nicknames and would prefer proper names to be used to avoid confusion and I would certainly not call Hamilton the boss.
I don't know why there are some here that are making up the reasons for his nickname, but it was something given to him on F1T, because when he first joined McLaren the Boss (Hugo Boss) logo on his car was where the driver's name traditionally was, so he was called "The Boss".

That's the real reason, so if you don't find it suitable then that's your issue :P
Yer.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Turkish GP 2011 - Istanbul

Post

Hangaku wrote: I don't know why there are some here that are making up the reasons for his nickname, but it was something given to him on F1T, because when he first joined McLaren the Boss (Hugo Boss) logo on his car was where the driver's name traditionally was, so he was called "The Boss".

That's the real reason, so if you don't find it suitable then that's your issue :P
This explanation certainly matches my memory of its first use - I think it was smikle who started it while others decided to use it sarcastically .
"In downforce we trust"