Excellent post, thank you! =D>wesley123 wrote:1.yes and on the other hand it is allowed to flex 20mm, see the contradiction.HampusA wrote:Doesn´t matter, the rules clearly state that it´s illegal for part on the car to flex. RBR wing does flex, thus it´s illegal. NO MATTER WHAT THE TESTS SAY.
The wing do flex more then 20mm aswell. Again, if you know the metric system you would agree only by going by pictures.
2.Also, have you ever thought that the wing is within this 20mm flex with the load, but a front wing generates much more load thus, it will logically flex further.
3.Also have you noticed that that ground scraping of the front wing only happens under braking and kerbriding? isnt it logical that the front comes down under braking, thus it is more likely to hit the ground?
4.The RBR has more rake so the wing is automaticly closer to the ground, with ground effect it generates more df thus gets sucked closer to the ground. It is not flexing any more then another front wing, the front wing just generates more df, allowing more flex.
Apart from that, arent these tests there to deem if a car is legal or not? The RBR passes these tests so I cannot see in what way it is illegal.
I suggest you to take off your anti-red bull glasses and get a more objective stance.