hardingfv32 wrote:Yes, Newey has made a successful compromise. BUT are ALL of the elements of this compromise?
I am ASSUMING for this question that the RB KERS system is less the ideal and that it is PROBABLY the batteries causing the issue. These assumptions are made to narrow the scope of the variables.
So that said:
WHY... if you want to reduce your cooling requirement do you put the batteries in the hottest part of the car? If you are concern with packaging, why do you place the batteries in one of the most critical areas of your design?
Why would Newey not use the area behind the driver/fuel cell? What makes this area behind the driver off limits to Newey?
It's not a case of reducing cooling requirement, it's a case of making an optimal aero shape. Newey designed an optimal aero shape to fit the car inards as he saw them in. He then said "if you can get KERS in there too, go for it". In his consideration, the RB7 is better with that aero shape and
no KERS than it is with good KERS and not that aero shape. The fact that they fitted a half-assed KERS into that shape is an added bonus, even when it didn't work every time.