

OK, so it's not F1. But I couldn't resist.......
MIKEY_! wrote:This died out because it looked silly, at least loose in style guys.
Andrew, I've read another source (OLD [printed] Autosport?) that credited the high nose to a Newey-designed Leyton House. Just a small "step" really, just a couple inches IIRC.andrew wrote:Raised nose pioneered by Tyrell then later adopted by Benetton and then everyone else.
True indeed Don, the Leyton House by Newey was indeed the first attempt at a raised nose, Harvey Postlethwaite cought on to it with the Tyrrell, the John Barnard walked the whole nine yards with his Benetton.donskar wrote:Andrew, I've read another source (OLD [printed] Autosport?) that credited the high nose to a Newey-designed Leyton House. Just a small "step" really, just a couple inches IIRC.andrew wrote:Raised nose pioneered by Tyrell then later adopted by Benetton and then everyone else.
What Toza Mazza said was correct and imo pretty obvious. How can such thing like this not be benificial? It doesnt hurt anything aerodynamic since there is nothing behind the wing. it is essentially just bolting on wings for maxc downfore, pretty useful, same as the X-wings on the sidepod.ajdavison2 wrote: I don't think anything in F1 is designed to look good, the reason these type of wings died out was probably because they weren't functional, or didn't give enough benefit.