Why do teams use different camber with same tyres?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Why do teams use different camber with same tyres?

Post

1) You are making these camber judgments based on photos?

2) With everyone using the same front tire, can there be much difference in front camber between cars? In general is there not an optimum camber for the front tire?

Brian
Last edited by Steven on 07 Aug 2011, 22:40, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: This thread was split from the Red Bull RB7 thread

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:1) You are making these camber judgments based on photos?

2) With everyone using the same front tire, can there be much difference in front camber between cars? In general is there not an optimum camber for the front tire?

Brian
Given all the cars roll differing amounts, angles and have different compensation rates. No.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Well we got two dry tyres every weekend minimum ...so from that alone there is an awful lot of compromise potentially optimising your car for use of both.

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

"Given all the cars roll differing amounts, angles and have different compensation rates."

Yes, but shouldn't the final camber numbers for all cars be the same at max cornering G's? Wouldn't this be where the tire produces max cornering performance? Shouldn't everything be done to give the tire exactly what it wants?

Tire compounds: how do different compounds effect the camber requirements? Isn't the construction the same?

For discussion purposes I am assuming that we are attempting to get max performance from front and rear tires. I appreciate that some reduction in performance at one end could be required for balance requirements.

Brian

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

AFAIK camber is to maximise contact patch when the car is in roll. Theoretically, when you make a car stiffer, it rolls less, and you should put less camber. When you have it softer, and let it roll more, then more camber is ideal.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Why wouldn't the camber curve be designed to match the amount of roll you have?

I guess we should specify that we a talking about camber at max cornering force, not the static setting. Should the camber setting for all cars be about the same at the max cornering performance point?

Brian

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

It would; but then each different team's cars would have different suspension settings which would dictate different amounts of roll.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
HampusA
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 14:49

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

All cars are different, one number might not be the same for the other teams.
The truth will come out...

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Might not even be the same between cars in the same team...

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

So... you are say that the tires have a variable sweet spot? That you can get equal performance from the tire with different maximum cornering load (dynamic?) camber readings?

Brian

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Sounds like a question for JT; and for a new thread.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

kalinka
kalinka
9
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 00:01
Location: Hungary

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:So... you are say that the tires have a variable sweet spot? That you can get equal performance from the tire with different maximum cornering load (dynamic?) camber readings?

Brian


Why would it be so impossible ? Cars do have other variable sweet spots, that we know for sure, like balance,wing AoA,suspension settings...etc. It's too dependable of the driving style. We could see all year that teammates having quite different setups, could be alongside each other in qualy and race too. (IMHO)

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

The driving style in the case of a spec tire needs to be configured to optimize the tires performance. Some drivers will need more setup compromises than others to optimizes tire performance, but the fewest compromises equals the highest level of optimization.

Brian

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:"Yes, but shouldn't the final camber numbers for all cars be the same at max cornering G's? Wouldn't this be where the tire produces max cornering performance? Shouldn't everything be done to give the tire exactly what it wants?
No, not really that simple.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Hoping to learn something.... Why not?

I am assuming that we are trying to get max performance from front & rear tires. Also, we do not have to degrade the performance of either end to solve some kind handling problem or driver preference.

Brian