I was thinking the same. Those two were pretty good cars. Ferrari's ambition was the reason for firing him, I guess (They've got Pat Fry, so this was the reason as well). Mercedes really needs to get their act together. Recruiting Costa would be a step in the right direction.ESPImperium wrote:Probably a good addition, will make the Mercedes technichal department a really good one with Bob Bell there as well. Costa has helped develop some really aggressive cars in the past 5 years with the F2007 and F2008 being the cream of his crop, Bob bell with his background from Renault will make Mercedes a strong contender for 2012 now.
Id shorten the odds for Mercedes next year now, but not by much, maybes from 3/7 to win a race to 5/7. Id recon that 2013 may be when they regualarly start challanging for something more regular than races.
Well Ferrai had the strongest car in the 2nd half of last season 2. They were doing fantastically in circuits so different like Monza & Singapore. P1 & P3 in Monza & P2 is Singapore with P1-P2 in Hockenheim says a lot about how good the car was. The car performed very well in all types of tracks.Morteza wrote:I was thinking the same. Those two were pretty good cars. Ferrari's ambition was the reason for firing him, I guess (They've got Pat Fry, so this was the reason as well). Mercedes really needs to get their act together. Recruiting Costa would be a step in the right direction.ESPImperium wrote:Probably a good addition, will make the Mercedes technichal department a really good one with Bob Bell there as well. Costa has helped develop some really aggressive cars in the past 5 years with the F2007 and F2008 being the cream of his crop, Bob bell with his background from Renault will make Mercedes a strong contender for 2012 now.
Id shorten the odds for Mercedes next year now, but not by much, maybes from 3/7 to win a race to 5/7. Id recon that 2013 may be when they regualarly start challanging for something more regular than races.
The real force behind the Ferraris of 2006, 2007 and 2008 was Nikolas Tombazis and the upturn in 2006 when Ferrari recruited him back was clear. As for Bell, he had a great deal of good technical people working at Renault that are still there, especially on the mechanical side, and the technical direction of that car over several years had already been set up by Mike Gascoyne. He didn't really have to do a great deal.ESPImperium wrote:Probably a good addition, will make the Mercedes technichal department a really good one with Bob Bell there as well. Costa has helped develop some really aggressive cars in the past 5 years with the F2007 and F2008 being the cream of his crop, Bob bell with his background from Renault will make Mercedes a strong contender for 2012 now.
Force India have a few fantastic people too comparing their results with their resources. IT DOES not matter how many talented people you have or what direction you take until you have a fantastic Technical Director. You cant win talented engineers in Formula neither does Mike G. has anything major to do with how competitive a car will be. If W02 wins Bob Bell will have a major hand in it not Ross Brawn.munudeges wrote:The real force behind the Ferraris of 2006, 2007 and 2008 was Nikolas Tombazis and the upturn in 2006 when Ferrari recruited him back was clear. As for Bell, he had a great deal of good technical people working at Renault that are still there, especially on the mechanical side, and the technical direction of that car over several years had already been set up by Mike Gascoyne. He didn't really have to do a great deal.ESPImperium wrote:Probably a good addition, will make the Mercedes technichal department a really good one with Bob Bell there as well. Costa has helped develop some really aggressive cars in the past 5 years with the F2007 and F2008 being the cream of his crop, Bob bell with his background from Renault will make Mercedes a strong contender for 2012 now.
All is not quite what it appears and you have to look very carefully at who is really doing the work and what the results are depending on who is at what team.
In theory they already had Ross Brawn himself, then Bob Bell and now Aldo Costa, why I guess one or two more would do it?Morteza wrote:How many technical directors does a team need? I mean they've already got Bob Bell. Is it gonna do them any good?
Ross Brawn is the TEAM PRINCIPAL. He is as much a Technical Director as is Stefano Domenicelli or Martin Whitemarsh. Costa joining is purely specualtive at this point of time. So wondering about many heads is over-thinking the issue.xpensive wrote:In theory they already had Ross Brawn himself, then Bob Bell and now Aldo Costa, why I guess one or two more would do it?Morteza wrote:How many technical directors does a team need? I mean they've already got Bob Bell. Is it gonna do them any good?
But seriously, if this recruitment is true, I wonder who will report to who then?
Your acting as if Tombazis was the man who single handedly created the 1st car of the season time & time again. 2005 season for anybody who did see,was a year lost on tires. Not Rory not Newey could have said that season. Bridgestone was much & much slower than Michelin. The 2006 season car was actually very good & 2nd fastest to Renault & quite competitive. Also you should not the fact that any Tech Director would take atleast 1 year to make a major impression.munudeges wrote:I hadn't heard that Costa's name was flying around regarding Mercedes, but if true I just can't see him being the kind of person they need. His track record doesn't read very well - took over from Rory Byrne after 2004, disastrous 2005 season that was down to more than just the tyres and gets seriously helped out from 2006 onwards when Tombazis is brought back in as Chief Designer.
What's Costa going to be responsible for? Aerodynamics, mechanicals......? I'm not aware of his background. It's immediately clear to me what the guys at Red Bull do and what their specialities are. That's not so clear with other teams.
Costa should feel right at home at Brackley. I'm beginning to admire Rory Byrne more and more because it's become clear to me what he was having to put up with while effectively being TD at Ferrari in all but name.
Actually I think most teams who use that structure have CTO as the highest, TD 2nd and CD 3rd. Example being Pat Fry was called Chief Designer, and Aldo was TD when they were both at Ferrari earlier this year. Can't think of anyone who has all 3 outside of my head though.marcush. wrote:the latest trend is to have a chief technical officer -Newey ,Gascoyne - a tech director and a chief designer .
If Bell is TD ,then Costa is chief technical officer ? or chief designer? Aldo was chief designer with Minardi for a long time before switching to Ferrari in 1997.He only got TD in 2008 there