Post anything that doesn't belong in any other forum, including gaming and topics unrelated to motorsport. Site specific discussions should go in the site feedback forum.
I have some questions and NO i´m not a conspiracy theorist that don´t believe Americans went to the moon or that World Cup in sweden ´58 was never played etc etc.
I just wonder how two buildings can free fall with stuff below it and ultimately breaking the laws of nature. More specifically Newton´s third law.
Or how any of these towers including WTC could be the first towers that collapses due to fire or airplanes in the history of mankind.
And where Larry Silverstein was on the day of 9/11 when he always, everyday spends his mornings in WTC as he said himself.
His daughter and son that works there did not show up for work that day.
Or the fact that a few weeks earlier he signed an insurance policy for terrorist attacks on the WTC towers.
Why we don´t have any footage of Pentagon getting hit by an airplane despite being the most videotaped building in the whole world.
There is no building in the world that has more cameras pointed at itself then Pentagon.
Why there is a big giant hole inside Pentagon.
Why there were parts of an aircraft on the lawn that was not from the airplane they allegedly claimed crashed into the building.
ETC ETC
If you have any of these answers that would be awsome.
Last edited by HampusA on 13 Sep 2011, 20:22, edited 1 time in total.
and if anyone thinks that a goverment would never do something like this or even think about doing something like this, search for Operation Northwoods
You don´t feel the slightest of guilt by just waving it past and letting innocent people die?
How about you try to answer the questions instead. If you can that is.
EDIT: Really Really sad to see how humans stick their head in the sand..
But i guess it´s thea easiest way instead of putting the real murderers behind bars.
That means no 9/11 discussion, take it elsewhere better suited for that. This is the Off topic but it is still very much a regulated section of the forum.
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it’s in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.
No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition and both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution--not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security.
And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.
Tragically, on November 22nd 1963, John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he had planned to end the Vietnam war, and it was a big secret, until recently.
---
Ban me i don´t care. Try and do something instead of sticking your head in the sand.
10 years have passed. Those issues have been discussed to death. If you come upon them now, you are too late IMO.
Myself and the rest of us we may have our views, suspect something fishy or not, but there have not been any new reliable evidence, and chewing the old stuff is really boring.
Even we start again, nothing will change.
Better not provoke the forum administration. Calm down and put your energy into contributing (if you can) to the forum's main purpose. It needs contribution lately IMHO.
My friendly 2 cents.
F1PitRadio @F1PitRadio : MSC, "Sorry guys, there's not more in it"
Spa 2012
