Williams FW33

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Leon
Leon
17
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 21:58
Location: Armenia

Re: Williams FW33

Post

I want the return of this nose 8)

Image
"Clouds now and again
give a soul some respite from
moon-gazing-behold."

Matsuo Basho

User avatar
JackHammer
4
Joined: 03 May 2011, 01:53
Location: Gloucester

Re: Williams FW33

Post

Leon wrote:I want the return of this nose 8)

Image
I don't :P
It's so ugly they don't even have it in the conference center, they have a normal nosed version
Image

hecti
hecti
13
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 08:34
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: Williams FW33

Post

JackHammer wrote:
Leon wrote:I want the return of this nose 8)

Image
I don't :P
It's so ugly they don't even have it in the conference center, they have a normal nosed version
I have a feeling that it could work a lot better in the current regs than it did back in 2005(?)

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Williams FW33

Post

hecti wrote:I have a feeling that it could work a lot better in the current regs than it did back in 2005(?)
With the standardised central section and attachment points, how would it work?

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Williams FW33

Post

so the new brooms work better than the old ones....i have the gut feeling the car will be cemented where it was the whole year.(But then I thought Senna would not score a point...but he did ..)

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Williams FW33

Post

wesley123 wrote:I am thinking U-sidepods next year. Together with the low gearbox you are just able to create an airstream all the way through the tunnel, over the gearbox/crashbox and under the beamwing.

As for next year, Barrichello and Raikkonen should e driving next to each other, I am sure that Barrichello has not lost it, but just eneds to be pushed and motivated to go for a good result, even if that means beating Raikkonen on an regular basis, it will give Barrichello motivation to work harder and help in development. Barrichello is currently just lacking motivation.
MAldonado is better than barichello right now. He's definitely faster and he brings more money too. I don't see the benefits of rubens outweighing raikonenen and Maldonado.
For Sure!!

User avatar
MIKEY_!
7
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: Williams FW33

Post

Next years car is going to have to be very different (all new i suspect). Are there any particularly good points to this car. Any areas where it does perform well?

For the record, places for each driver at GP:

Rubens: ret,ret,13,15,17, 9, 9,12,13,ret,13,16,12,13

Pastor: ret,ret,18,17,15,18,ret,18,14,14,16,10,11,11

Pastor has beaten Rubens 5 times. At the last 3 races, Rubens retried at Germany and was beaten at Spain also.

Qualifying:

Rubens: 17,15,15,11,19,11,16,13,15,14,15,14,13,12

Pastor: 15,18,17,14, 9, 8,12,15, 7,13,17,21,14,13

Pastor fastest 6 times.

King Six
King Six
1
Joined: 27 May 2008, 16:52
Location: London, England

Re: Williams FW33

Post

wesley123 wrote:I am thinking U-sidepods next year. Together with the low gearbox you are just able to create an airstream all the way through the tunnel, over the gearbox/crashbox and under the beamwing.
That's what I was thinking. I doubt it would be possible or even make any sense, but it'd be interesting if a team tries something like the U sidepods, Williams gearbox, with a super compact rear end like the RB7, pull rod of course. Packaging would seem like a nightmare if not an impossibility. Throw in the Force India/Lotus/Mercedes blade style roll hoop and Toro Rosso double floor for good measure. :lol:

User avatar
Byronrhys
0
Joined: 09 Aug 2010, 03:14

Re: Williams FW33

Post

King Six wrote:
wesley123 wrote:I am thinking U-sidepods next year. Together with the low gearbox you are just able to create an airstream all the way through the tunnel, over the gearbox/crashbox and under the beamwing.
That's what I was thinking. I doubt it would be possible or even make any sense, but it'd be interesting if a team tries something like the U sidepods, Williams gearbox, with a super compact rear end like the RB7, pull rod of course. Packaging would seem like a nightmare if not an impossibility. Throw in the Force India/Lotus/Mercedes blade style roll hoop and Toro Rosso double floor for good measure. :lol:
That car would be a disaster...Double floor and U wouldn't work alone.

munudeges
munudeges
-14
Joined: 10 Jun 2011, 17:08

Re: Williams FW33

Post

That would be a car with no sidepods at all..........

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Williams FW33

Post

Williams gbox and RBR rear end also probably wouldn't work with a U-sidepod.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Williams FW33

Post

U-pods and Williams gearbox would though...

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Williams FW33

Post

PhillipM wrote:U-pods and Williams gearbox would though...
That would work very nicely indeed!

Who of the big guns will try Williams gearbox idea for 2012? Any thoughts?
More could have been done.
David Purley

bjpower
bjpower
-1
Joined: 17 May 2009, 14:26

Re: Williams FW33

Post

will anyone copy the merc stacked radiator ?
mike make more of a U :)

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Williams FW33

Post

bjpower wrote:will anyone copy the merc stacked radiator ?
mike make more of a U :)
Its been a big problem for Merc this year. If anyone copies it they will go through the same teething problems.
My guess is Mercedes will probably ditch the idea as it was meant to help with a short wheelbase design, something that has also presented its own problems for Mercedes.
More could have been done.
David Purley