Well, my analysis is only to visualize effect. Its not for calculating exact value. In USSR in the late 80s has been done a huge work about supercirculation. Before USSR disappeared supercirculation was one of the basic principles of 5th generation jet fighter. MiG 1.44 is a prototype of new gen jet fighter that supposed to be designed:PNSD wrote:Has your analysis primarily looked at the flow injection at the trailing edge?
I suppose you already know a great deal of work has been conducted on using flow injection, adding momentum to the boundary layer? Of course these studies have primarily focused on an injection point around 30% aerofoil chords, or around the transition point.
Such things used to be common with A/C however it was weight penalties that killed blown devices such as this.
It supposed to have a flat nozzle which will create supercurculation effect over the fuselage. However due to USSR collapse the work was not finished.
There was also experimental aircraft named "Photon":
"Photon" used supercirculation effect exactly the same way as I described above. Thousands of hours were spend in TsAGI wind tunnel studying "Photon" aerodynamics. In was proved that "Photon" max Cl was 3.6 without using flaps/slats. If we dont use flaps/slats we can save a lot of weight. From the other side using supercirculation will significantly decrease wing area wich will lead to saving weight too. As u can see "Photon" has a very small wing, although it has short take off distance.