You don't normally see that kind of agression at the front of the grid. I think Seb's defending would have been fine if Jenson's front wheel wasn't alongside Seb's rear axle. You tend to stop pushing once the other car get alongside. Seb said to Jenson he did indeed see Jenson next to him yet Seb kept pushing him off, I think that's what annoyed Jenson.So that's how we are racing then
Freedom is right....at the end of the chat, just before they stand up and walk to the podium Button says 'so that's how we racing then hey'....raymondu999 wrote:I think you misheard. Jenson said, "So you didn't see me at the start, then?" and Seb said he DIDN'T see him.
Vettel vs Alonso was different - that was on an overtaking move. The one that happened at Monza start was Alonso on the grass; but this was of Alonso's own volition; Hamilton and Vettel were side by side, and Alonso lurched to the right hand side of the track (inside of T1) and he didn't mind his right tyres on the grass
I stand corrected. I just watched the post-race forum and Button said he spoke to Vettel afterwards. According to Button, Vettel said Vettel didn't see Button until Button dropped behind him.raymondu999 wrote:I think you misheard. Jenson said, "So you didn't see me at the start, then?" and Seb said he DIDN'T see him.
Vettel vs Alonso was different - that was on an overtaking move. The one that happened at Monza start was Alonso on the grass; but this was of Alonso's own volition; Hamilton and Vettel were side by side, and Alonso lurched to the right hand side of the track (inside of T1) and he didn't mind his right tyres on the grass
Aced wrote:Perhaps you're right. I do believe that todays race was decided by tyre management though. Not saying that JB hasn't had raw speed lately but his ability to make tyres last today was a massive plus for him.horse wrote:
What I saw was a Ferrari that had more tyre available (i.e less wear) than RB and McLaren. We've seen this used positively before with a fast degrading option tyre, but today was different in that the car was capable of getting the prime to work as well, which has been their Achilles heel in similar circumstances (by not getting to temperature). I think if Ferrari can maintain this good tyre wear / good temperature combination then they could well be right up there for the end of the season.
It's interesting though because Ferrari made no upgrades to the car this weekend, as far as I know. So I'm not sure whether the track suited them or that they actually figured out how to make the tyres work. After all they've had horrible traction the past few races.
I believe it all comes down to the tyres. Even though lately JB has been very close to Lewis on raw speed, we've even witnessed it on qualifying, his good tyre management has been the advantage.Traction wrote:What do you think the difference is?raymondu999 wrote:Wow. JB wins but Lewis says he didn't have any grip? That has to be a first, hasn't it?
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2011/10/09/h ... king-race/
If I remember correctly, in Hungary, Lewis would always increase the gap to JB to about 9 seconds in the beginning of the stint. But towards the end of the stint JB would always close down the gap to about 3 4 seconds. That's about 5-6 seconds in just 5-6 laps. That happened twice, exactly the same way.
Lewis is definitely eating his tyres very aggressively. It could be his driving style, it could be the setup, it could be that he's pushing very hard on low-temp tyres. Perhaps that's the reason why JB always takes it easy on the tyres early on a stint.
Bottom line, in my opinion, the Pirelli tyre isn't working for Lewis. He's had the issue all year.
Yeah sure.raymondu999 wrote:smikle - golda was just saying that Hamilton's early laps forced Vettel to push harder; and this destroyed his tyres, which in turn helped set the victory up for Button.
Here's hoping. Would make for a much more interesting season.n smikle wrote:Well Japan was a good race. Nothing too special though. I particularly was watching how Vettel reacts to having cars of near equal speed with his (now that the cars seem to be close in speed even the Ferrari).
I think that if the season started like how it is now, Vettel would just be like Vettel of 2010. A normal, mortal driver. Notice how frustrated he was at that backmarker. Waving his fist around like he's shooting dice. Frustrations setting in.. or VEttel's true colours showing up. Maybe the real Vettel we will see next year if Mclaren, Ferrari and Merc do a good job and we get more close races.
Wishful thinking of a Hamilton fan IMO. We know how good Vettel is and no talking down will change that.n smikle wrote: Maybe the real Vettel we will see next year if Mclaren, Ferrari and Merc do a good job and we get more close races.
Problem is the FIA have now effectively endorsed that behaviour. They haven't done anything to stop it from happening.marcush. wrote:bollocks.Vettel had no reason to swerve towards the right side but to block Button ...he said he had a very good start but somehow Button got away even better on the dirty side...
Vettel played hardball simple as that.I think it was a logic conclusion of what alanso did to him in Monza ...
I'm not sure that's the case. First stint Hamilton was keeping Vettel honest up to when he had his puncture. Vettel then had to pit on the next lap (maybe 2) because his own sector times were dropping off because of the tyres. He even came on the radio saying the rears were gone.ringo wrote:what i find interesting is that Vettel would have won had he not come out in traffic.
He would not have come out in front of Button when Button pitted later, but if you look near the end of the race where both he and Alonso were reeling button in.
Vettel may have done the same thing if he was ahead of Alonso, which he should have been without the traffic.
redbull seem to have setup the car pretty strangely this race. It had the long run pace, but it took many laps to kick in.
For each stint, it took Vettel a good number of laps to get up to speed and setting quick sectors.
Let us not forget this was a championship deciding race. Remember how poorly others have performed under similar pressure, ie Lewis in Brazil 2008, Button in Brazil 2009, Webber and Alonso in Abu Dhabi last year..n smikle wrote: I think that if the season started like how it is now, Vettel would just be like Vettel of 2010. A normal, mortal driver. Notice how frustrated he was at that backmarker. Waving his fist around like he's shooting dice. Frustrations setting in.. or VEttel's true colours showing up.
they were both LH's fault! Today he clearly drove into Massa, very similar to the Spa incident with Kobaajdavison2 wrote:There are alot of similarities with the singapore incident, i.e. One driver trying to overtake another on the outside, the driver on the outside makes contact and damages his car. Obviously in the singapore incident massa also suffered. but the point im making is that if ham was to blame in singapore, and lets assume without the usual BS that he was. Then surely we must also say that massa was to blame for this incident. I know the corners are different, with different closing speeds etc etc. but I think the point i'm making is valid that Massa is being a bit hypocritical in once again having ago at Ham when I see this incident as his fault. Also note that I have only seen the race once and i am therefore only going off the benefit of the bbc coverage and replays. I am also not being bias towards any one driver before we get into the usual 'fanboy' criticisims.beelsebob wrote:Ah, I found what I wanted – an interview with Massa...
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/95216
Funny to see him raging again after another race where he collides with Hamilton, Hamilton comes off worse, and then comes back to finish ahead.