gilgen wrote:I fail to see how the team designers can have less knowledge on how to design a car, than some of the posters here. I am sure that the CFD projections showed that an SWB was every bit as effect as a LWB. OK, the design got something wrong, but how can anyone say that it was one specific issue. SWB cars have won races in the past.
undoubtedly a valid point and it crossed my mind many times before not just this year.
But then ..somehow Mercedes decides to drop their last qualy attempt repeatedly to save fresh rubber for the race only in the last races when me and other forum members wrote about this possibility here in this forum long time ago -in fact even before the first race -if I remember correctly -as a valid strategy .
I think it is very well possible that people in the middle of the woods will not realise what it is and us who stand outside but are very much interested can see things clearly they are blind for .Be it pressure or misunderstanding or just a reluctance to deviaate from things you have a certain routine going on.
I rather think the teams are very conservative in some areas and anxiously looking at those who are in the lead (copy red bull...) to avoid putting themselves in a vulnerable position if things don´t work out .
Just look at the behaviour of HRT,Lotus and Virgin.. instead of concentrating to amass as much info as possible they try to fight for beating the car in front..
that´s just childish considering the money it costs to run the car.You are not allowed to test but teams unable to gain points could well use a race to go through a massive testing programm during the two hours of a race ,couldn´t they?
This would really be a big benefit later in the year or for the coming seasons .I think thinking out of the box is necessary to get to the front.Staring at REDBULL will only show you :You need Adrian Newey .But ,he is not available....damn we are finished..