Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Yeap. He had a follow up tweet to me:
@ScarbsF1 wrote:2012 changes at the of the 2011 regs
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Interestingly, I haven't found an article that bans exhaust blown diffuser.
Of course I may misunderstood FIAspeak though...

User avatar
Tozza Mazza
1
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 12:00
Location: UK

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

timbo wrote:Interestingly, I haven't found an article that bans exhaust blown diffuser.
Of course I may misunderstood FIAspeak though...
It's an old copy of the regs, from December 2010, so they are only pre planned changes for 2012, and not yet confirmed.

User avatar
MIKEY_!
7
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

You can gain DF by running a larger flap on the rear wing can't you? FIA may have killed their DRS a bit.

TzeiTzei
TzeiTzei
5
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 21:19

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Btw in the regulations for 2012 i found this:
"4.2 Weight distribution :
For 2012 only, the weight applied on the front and rear wheels must not be less than 291kg and
342kg respectively at all times during the qualifying practice session", which is exactly the same as in 2011. I thought the fixed weight distribution was to be scrapped for next year.

It's in here. Article 21: changes for 2012.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

TzeiTzei wrote:Btw in the regulations for 2012 i found this:
"4.2 Weight distribution :
For 2012 only, the weight applied on the front and rear wheels must not be less than 291kg and
342kg respectively at all times during the qualifying practice session", which is exactly the same as in 2011. I thought the fixed weight distribution was to be scrapped for next year.

It's in here. Article 21: changes for 2012.
Tthoughtso too, but they have been kept for one more year as the teams dont want to chance someone lucking into the Pirelli optimal distrubution to optimal weight. Means you can run a heavier car and get that percentage right tho.

User avatar
matt21
86
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 13:17

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Maybe it is a silly question.
But can somebody explain me what the apprevations "TE upper", "TE lower", and "LE" stand for?

And "Highest" and "Lowest" mean the upper and lower curvature of the profile?

Image

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Its a silly diagram. The co-ordinates are far too close together, and who can manufacture or measure to 0.001 mmm?

If you look at the numbers, the first co-ordinate in the first column is the at the trailing edge, hence TE.

Then both the x & y values rise in the first column. The second column starts off with the biggest y value, hence the high point.

The x vaulues keep increasing in the second column, but the y values decrease until we get to the leading edge, hence LE.

Then x starts decreasing in the third column, so we going backwards, y keep decreasing until we get to the lowest point.

The fourth column takes us back to where we started.

Tyler
Tyler
0
Joined: 06 Jul 2011, 18:50

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

I wonder if the low noses reg will give Merc-gp any advantage.
They've had the most recent experience in building a championship winning low nose car in a year when most of the other cars had high noses - The Brawn BGP001.
That car had great balance and part of the reason was so they could put more ballast in the front.
Perhaps this knowledge will help them in 2012?
I've got high hopes for the W03.
Maybe Brawn's experience with periscope exhausts from his Ferrari days will also be an advantage for 2012?

User avatar
matt21
86
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 13:17

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Thanks Richard!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

I'm not sure if having experience with periscope exhausts would stand them much good in particular. Everyone got it working in the end anyways.

While the BGP001 was very good, their end of 2009 car was not championship material. The McLaren was a better car in slow corners, and the Bulls better in high speed. The ballast thing won't really come into play given the mandated weight distribution. But it will be the airflow management around and under the nose that will benefit them methinks
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
Neco FEROX
0
Joined: 12 Jun 2010, 14:42

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

To be honest, I don't that lowering the nose will stop the car from going airborne when it does hit another car's rear wheel. But to be honest, there is so many different factors to take into question. Speed? Headwind? Marbles? Racing line?

User avatar
MIKEY_!
7
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Given the rules now in place for 2012 it won't stop the cars flipping. A nose at the rumored half wheel height would but only when the nose hits the wheel of another car. It would also stop the nose riding up over the sidepod and hitting the driver in a side on. Strictly by the rules a nose tip could potentially be just as high as many of this years ones.

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

Yes and with the low nose(ofc lower then now) one could scoop under the crashboxof the other guys and get a whole car shoved in his face
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

User avatar
SiLo
138
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Rules mandate low noses for 2012

Post

It might stop cars riding up from behind (lol) but it may cause them to scoop up the cars they are hitting. Surely this is solving nothing?
Felipe Baby!