http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/formula ... 711813.stm
Bernie wrote:"Austin? I wouldn't want to put my money down that that will happen. I hope it will and we are doing our best to make it happen, but I wouldn't want to say 'yes'."
Bernie wrote:"Austin? I wouldn't want to put my money down that that will happen. I hope it will and we are doing our best to make it happen, but I wouldn't want to say 'yes'."
I don't think so...I think you have it figuredbhallg2k wrote:Considering the addition of races in Russia (2014) and New Jersey (2013), I wonder if Ecclestone's statements are just a thinly-veiled attempt to rattle investor confidence in the USGP in Austin so that he can get out of that contract by effectively inducing their withdrawal rather than terminating it himself. I have no idea what's included in the terms of the contract, but I feel pretty safe in assuming that it likely contains provisions for some sort of penalty to be levied against whichever party breaks the deal.
While all of this is purely speculation on my part, I wonder if Ecclestone finds this necessary because the teams simply will not agree to a 22-race season, which is how many there would be in 2014 if everything remains as it currently stands.
Perhaps Austin became expendable the very moment the ink dried on the NJ contract.
(Of course, I might be wrong.)
Of course if you or I were wanting to undertake a project like this then we'd have collateral warranties and back to back contracts.WilliamsF1 wrote:How come Circuit Of The Americas did not have a binding contract with Full Throttle Productions
Ouch..Don's gonna get you for that one...!bhallg2k wrote: ...
Frankly, Texas is like a toddler who doesn't play well with others because he never quite learned to share his toys.
...
I think Mrs. Combs is tending to their collective wounded pride by starting a good ol' fashioned pissing contest. It's the Texas way.