Ferraripilot wrote:I can agree with your logic that a W02 with the fundamental flaws removed would be a successful car. Also the lack of EBD and its varying efficiences to worrow about narrows the gap a massive amount as well. RB was obviously seeing the most benefit from that arrangement as it was their technology and if W02 saw half the benefit RB had I would be surprised. With these changes I could see the 1-1.5 second gap being about eliminated. If you think about it (I'm sure everyone has a ton!) W02 sort of had the worst of the worst in terms of CoG. High fuel tank and high radiators just ruined things. Just fixing those issues alone is worth probably a very good chunk of time. Any idea if the front suspension was at all linked to what was going on in the rear?
And yes, RB5 was very quick at the end of the season but I certainly do not at all recall Newey or Horner publicly stating they were excited about RB6 or that it was ready to compete at the front etc. I followed that season pretty close. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Snap out of it. Longer wheelbase has certain disadvantages too. Besides many guys have had a short wheelbase including Ferrari but nobody has made as much an issue of it as Mercedes.
Not running in Q3 & smart strategies have actually showed W02 better than it was. The whole cog is a bullshit exchuse. Everyone has to make a compromise between race trims & qualy runs. Ferrari too & they have a short wheelbase as well. Mercedes probably have to loose 1 or 2 tenth more of qualifying pace or race pace relative to the opposition.
That & MBHE are the best at EBF on par with Renault. The sheer chunk of time Mclaren & Force India got thanks to it is simply huge & you could see how big Mclaren suffered without it in Britain.
The entire car was a failure,look at W02's front wing & Mclaren's. The car was a dog & without Nico-MSC it would probably have been behind Renault & Force India.