Isn't it funny that just about everything around this Austin project is "planned", it just hasn't happened yet I guess?Pup wrote: ...
This little stretch of road was already planned to be widened,
...
...and a brand new 4-lane bridge to replace the old 2-lane one in that section of road.richard_leeds wrote:That of course is all conjecture and hyperbole because we don't know what they are planning to do for access, and they do have 10 months to lay just 1 mile of tarmac.
It wasn't built that way. It just wasn't built in a way that accounted for the shifting soil. There are no roads like this in Europe? Never mind. I know the answer to that. I've driven them.xpensive wrote:That image of the Austin-track's "access road" is so unbelievably and amusingly hicky, with it's crooked direction and level, crooked telephone poles, pick-up trucks and scruffy surroundings, where MrE is supposed to travel with his entourage.
Let's take it once again just for the hell of it, just for laughs!
http://www.statesman.com/sports/formula ... 91924.html
I can get you a bridge that size by 3 o'clock this afternoon. With nail polish.hairy_scotsman wrote:...and a brand new 4-lane bridge to replace the old 2-lane one in that section of road.richard_leeds wrote:That of course is all conjecture and hyperbole because we don't know what they are planning to do for access, and they do have 10 months to lay just 1 mile of tarmac.
I believe this is all correct, except iirc the county had already planned to renovate the road, but not to expand it.Pup wrote: I smell a bit of opportunism here (from multiple sources). This little stretch of road was already planned to be widened, most of it has already been done, and the land to complete the job was purchased years ago. But the work was stopped when the county found out that the circuit was being built, supposedly because of "heavy traffic", but if you take a look on google maps at the sections they've completed, it seems obvious that the road is amply designed for anything the circuit would add. They gave the road a major off ramp from the highway, so it's not like they were building it for a little farm traffic. No, it seems obvious to me that the county is holding up the road to get the circuit to pay for the work for them. In fact, the article states that the county wants COTA to pay for more than half of the work - for a project that they'd already budgeted! Hell, I'd tell them to go stick it, too.
There will only be a handfull of access points to the facility, and this is a main one. It's probably the 2nd most important (to the main entrance on FM 812), as Circuit of the Americas Blvd runs north from FM 812 through the property and exits onto Elroy Road. From there it's a very quick, short run back over to the onramp for SH130, or north on McAngus to Pearce Lane and its SH130 onramp or on to SH71.Actually, since the off ramp from the highway for that entrance (the secondary entrance, btw - I got suspicious the moment it got promoted to "one of the main entrances") is but a single lane wide, I'm not sure what the absolute need is to widen the road. Just keep one lane as one way traffic into the circuit and keep the other open for emergency traffic.
Well, then you might be able to make a little money this November.Pup wrote:I can get you a bridge that size by 3 o'clock this afternoon. With nail polish.hairy_scotsman wrote:...and a brand new 4-lane bridge to replace the old 2-lane one in that section of road.richard_leeds wrote:That of course is all conjecture and hyperbole because we don't know what they are planning to do for access, and they do have 10 months to lay just 1 mile of tarmac.
Of course I'll admit that recent events have changed my perspective a bit. Still hoping with fingers crossed, however, for a good outcome. (ETA: I am friends or acquaintances with many F1 fans here in Austin, having been brought together with them by this process. I have to say many of us are feeling the same, to one degree or another). Maybe they'll get out of their own way long enough to get it right.strad wrote:Sounds like Hairy is the one losing faith.
[...] As a die-hard americanophile, I will be there at the next US Grand Prix as sure as the sun comes up, I just don't think it's gonna happen in that particular environment.hairy_scotsman wrote: ...
You should definitely come to the race then. You'll have no trouble whatever assimilating in Hicksville...and no, those mailboxes aren't associated with mobile homes. There are a few houses along that stretch, all on fairly large plots of land.
It is sometimes overlooked by us Americans, and others that we work really well with "out in the middle of nowhere" shi+, especially Texas!strad wrote:In Japan ya had to use mass transit to get to the track.,,also Canada I believe.
In Fact,,,I don't think there is an F1 track that easy ingress and egress
Soo american, to see public transportation like train or subway as something negative, you rather sit in a line for three hours, then go around that maze of a parking-lot for another, as long as you can do it in the confinement of your own vehicle?strad wrote:In Japan ya had to use mass transit to get to the track.,,also Canada I believe.
In Fact,,,I don't think there is an F1 track that easy ingress and egress
WhiteBlue wrote:He is according to sources quoted in this thread including F1technical.WilliamsF1 wrote:WhiteBlue wrote: So what facts are missing?
The fact that you think Red is a major investor.
http://www.f1technical.net/news/15205
So what? McCombs is still one of the biggest investors. Nobody denied that Epstein is the lead investor. And this is the main reason why the project is in trouble. The guy is acting like a moron.WilliamsF1 wrote:Something more recent http://www.autoweek.com/article/20111113/F1/111119950