That truck will only hold 10cy, Not very big for Texas. I expect to see concrete pumps that size.WilliamsF1 wrote:I think it will be 100 with these. And to think it was done in about 7 hours, it is quiet amazing (if true).Mr Alcatraz wrote:Not bad at all, that is about 40 trucks worth!
Several points are interesting:Austin F1 track set for August completion
Austin circuit constructionAustin's new Formula 1 track layout is set to be completed in the middle of August, AUTOSPORT can reveal, with construction efforts now fully back on course at the United States venue.
Although there was uncertainty about the future of the race last year amid a dispute over the contract - with work at the circuit being halted for several weeks - a big push by Austin's organisers ensured it remained on the final 2012 calendar issued by the FIA's World Motor Sport Council in early December.
On the back of construction work having been resumed several weeks ago, race chiefs have confirmed that the recent delays will not have any negative effect on the event taking place. The current schedule is for the 3.4-mile track layout to be ready by the middle of August, with the rest of the infrastructure being completed well before the November 18 race date.
Senior representatives from the Circuit of the Americas, including president Steve Sexton, executive vice president Bruce Knox, director of racing operations Chuck Aksland, and chief marketing and sales officer Geoff Moore are in London this week for meetings with Bernie Ecclestone to update him on progress.
Moore told AUTOSPORT: "The race is on. Construction is happening six days a week. The paddock buildings are being topped off, work on the main grandstand has started and we are looking at mid-August for completion [of the track surface]."
Pressure on the construction efforts has been eased by the fact that the race's date has been shifted from an original June date to its November slot - where it will form a back-to-back with season finale Brazil.
Although a reported $25 million payment from local government, as part of a Major Event Trust Fund, will not be given to Austin officials in advance - track chiefs say the venue already has advanced funding in place to ensure completion of the track.
The money will be applied for after the race, once it is clear just how much tax revenue the Austin Grand Prix has generated for the local economy.
The total cost for the Circuit of the Americas is estimated at $350 million, with track chiefs hoping to attract 120,000 spectators for the inaugural event.
There you go WB, as discussed earlier, 350 MUSD sounds far more realistic for a new track with all the facilities,WhiteBlue wrote: ....
The most significant is the cost rise that has been incurred since the renegotiation of the F1 contract. All prior budgets have been below $300m AFAIK. It is an indication what the power struggle has done to the cost of the project. Naturally the cost for an accelerated building schedule working over time is more expensive. On top the cost for financing the race fee has also risen substantially.
xpensive wrote:There you go WB, as discussed earlier, 350 MUSD sounds far more realistic for a new track with all the facilities,WhiteBlue wrote: ....
The most significant is the cost rise that has been incurred since the renegotiation of the F1 contract. All prior budgets have been below $300m AFAIK. It is an indication what the power struggle has done to the cost of the project. Naturally the cost for an accelerated building schedule working over time is more expensive. On top the cost for financing the race fee has also risen substantially.
but I seriously doubt if the rather short but intense power-struggle had too much impact on that?
Now, where is that money coming from, the 25 MUSD Lone Star state money is miscalculation money in the context?
If you replace "money" with "cost" you are probably spot on.WilliamsF1 wrote:Probably someone got in more money acting like a moron.
Where did you get the idea that it was short? They lost months of good weather over the issue. Not only the time when the project was on full stop but also time when the project was obviously on the back burner. That period was from July 2011 to December 2011. I'm pretty sure that this time loss is at the core of the cost over run now. No idea what you pay for over time in Texas. Those workers who work through the night and Saturdays will not do this for pocket money. I would not be surprised if it added 25% or more to the original price.xpensive wrote:.. I seriously doubt if the rather short but intense power-struggle had too much impact on that?
Well the other moron was agreed to a race in June.WhiteBlue wrote:If you replace "money" with "cost" you are probably spot on.WilliamsF1 wrote:Probably someone got in more money acting like a moron.
Where did you get the idea that it was short? They lost months of good weather over the issue. Not only the time when the project was on full stop but also time when the project was obviously on the back burner. That period was from July 2011 to December 2011. I'm pretty sure that this time loss is at the core of the cost over run now. No idea what you pay for over time in Texas. Those workers who work through the night and Saturdays will not do this for pocket money. I would not be surprised if it added 25% or more to the original price.xpensive wrote:.. I seriously doubt if the rather short but intense power-struggle had too much impact on that?
Contractors realize when you are with your back to the wall and this is where they make extra profits. Same story as extras on molds and dies. The customers screws the suppliers on standard contracts and the suppliers only wait for extra features that are later necessary to the specification. They recover all the fat they could not build into the original contract and a tidy premium to compensate for the hassle. Business as usual.
A very good point indeed W.WilliamsF1 wrote: ....
Well the other moron was agreed to a race in June.
The June date was always something provisional. I suspected right away when the Austin race was announced that it was meant to be run back to back with Brazil.WilliamsF1 wrote:Well the other moron was agreed to a race in June.
Hellmund was still present and visible in the project when the November date was announced. IIRC, he made the first press contact re: the new date after its announcement, and he also mentioned months before that he liked the idea of a late-season start for many reasons, not the least of which was the possibility of very hot June weather:xpensive wrote:A very good point indeed W.WilliamsF1 wrote: ....
Well the other moron was agreed to a race in June.