Exactley what I tried to say about a few pages back, :L +1TheWiseOwl wrote:But that's fine since it's just CGI and not an interpretation of the actual car.......chepoi wrote:the nose is very low.........Marco Alves wrote:Another image from the MP4/27, but I also get the feeling that it is equal to the MP4/26 that we saw last year before launch:
EDIT
Here we go...
Same picture as last year, so will you please all shut up about it now.
Same here! +1 Surely you guys remembered this? There is no story or anything to get from this picture. it won't necessarily have U-pods or a very low nose. It's just a CGI sheet.N12ck wrote:Exactley what I tried to say about a few pages back, :L +1
#thestig184 wrote:Least some of you have seen sense on that marketing photoshop! Very disappointing chat on here going by the usual very high standards.
Hopefully Ive got slightly more accurate speculation. Asked my source if the Ferrari artist impression reminded him of anything. Said its hard to tell, tub is still in bits (not under a sheet !) reaffirmed the intakes look fairly straight forward rectangle. INTAKES not side pods, dont know about them.
Front wing looked same (as we know likely to launch with last years so no surprise) Also the nose looked similar to last years. This again could be last years but I for one and hoping it isnt and thus no Caterham-esk nose [-o< !!!!!
(Not first post, Im usually the stig84. Just currently have a username issue)
Pompous hey, Sorry didnt realise it was fun. Lots sounded quite serious a few pages back. Im away on limited internet and was just disappointed to go though pages looking at that picture. *edit Caterham doesnt have security issues. They launched the car in a magazine and as people know they often turn up a day early. Ferrari may not either, we have yet to see how accurate those tips are.ianwit wrote:It's just a bit of fun, stop being so pompous. Anyway, McLaren fans have to be patient, unlike those from Caterham and Ferrari who seem to have a few security issues
Sorry, my fault, was the enthusiasm...mx_tifoso wrote:More than a page of discussion about a generic silhouette!
That's not what my link on the inside said!thestig184 wrote:Least some of you have seen sense on that marketing photoshop! Very disappointing chat on here going by the usual very high standards.
Hopefully Ive got slightly more accurate speculation. Asked my source if the Ferrari artist impression reminded him of anything. Said its hard to tell, tub is still in bits (not under a sheet !) reaffirmed the intakes look fairly straight forward rectangle. INTAKES not side pods, dont know about them.
Front wing looked same (as we know likely to launch with last years so no surprise) Also the nose looked similar to last years. This again could be last years but I for one and hoping it isnt and thus no Caterham-esk nose [-o< !!!!!
(Not first post, Im usually the stig84. Just currently have a username issue)
Also: if ti is vertical, is it on the outside or on the ineside?FrukostScones wrote:#thestig184 wrote:Least some of you have seen sense on that marketing photoshop! Very disappointing chat on here going by the usual very high standards.
Hopefully Ive got slightly more accurate speculation. Asked my source if the Ferrari artist impression reminded him of anything. Said its hard to tell, tub is still in bits (not under a sheet !) reaffirmed the intakes look fairly straight forward rectangle. INTAKES not side pods, dont know about them.
Front wing looked same (as we know likely to launch with last years so no surprise) Also the nose looked similar to last years. This again could be last years but I for one and hoping it isnt and thus no Caterham-esk nose [-o< !!!!!
(Not first post, Im usually the stig84. Just currently have a username issue)
So the question is, is it a vertical or a horizontal rectangle? I f the latter, then high or low?
Or is it diagonal?shelly wrote:Also: if ti is vertical, is it on the outside or on the ineside?FrukostScones wrote:#thestig184 wrote:Least some of you have seen sense on that marketing photoshop! Very disappointing chat on here going by the usual very high standards.
Hopefully Ive got slightly more accurate speculation. Asked my source if the Ferrari artist impression reminded him of anything. Said its hard to tell, tub is still in bits (not under a sheet !) reaffirmed the intakes look fairly straight forward rectangle. INTAKES not side pods, dont know about them.
Front wing looked same (as we know likely to launch with last years so no surprise) Also the nose looked similar to last years. This again could be last years but I for one and hoping it isnt and thus no Caterham-esk nose [-o< !!!!!
(Not first post, Im usually the stig84. Just currently have a username issue)
So the question is, is it a vertical or a horizontal rectangle? I f the latter, then high or low?