Some alternitive liveries:
Dark grey:
White:
(Looks like a Hispania)
Larger: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6770 ... bd3e_b.jpg
PR I suspect, get as many people tuning as possible by suggesting that there'll be interesting things to observe that may or may not be illegal. I suspect that they've pushed the envelope as much as other teams but we won't really see how until 2nd/3rd test when the parts are put on the car. No way they'll give away copyable secrets at the unveiling.KeiKo403 wrote:McLaren are bound to have been in contact with Charlie & FIA throughout the design process. I know that the FIA have recently back tracked with Lotus' anti dive solution but McLaren aren't stupid enough to launch a car with legality issues if they haven't had it confirmed as legal yet. Surely??astracrazy wrote:bit strange making comments about battles regarding the car being legal before its even released.
Its something I'd expect to here after the car is released. i.e let people find things themselves and say these comments as a reaction to people questioning the car. This way they are virtually telling everyone the car could possibly not be legal? Unless its something so obvious, why wait.
Black looks very good. Perhaps like a black chrome would be amazing (black but the same chrome shine as we get atm)ESPImperium wrote:Some alternitive liveries:
you'll never get orange in reality. Wouldn't go down well with vodafonesnorri788 wrote: Can we have an orange one please!
You see, for those who are sneaky of mind, it is obvious that saying Vettel was the secret to the RB7's speed is a sarcastic way of saying "we found out your secrets!"Shakeman wrote:Maybe it was an off the record interview that found itself on the record.horse wrote:This is very possible too! But then why pull the story and who has pulled it, McLaren or Autosport?Shakeman wrote:A cynic (me) would suggest these "legal fight" comments are just trolling for views for their car launch.
It's quite un-McLaren like to be quite so "honest" about their drivers in public.
.
Haven't they learned from the F-duct to just shut their pie holes when you have a innovative device that nobody even notices or cares to ask about?Hangaku wrote:Perhaps this is what the article is eluding to. I think that perhaps McLaren are confident that their car is 100% legal, and maybe they have had sign-off from the FIA / Charlie. As such, this press release (or PR stunt, whatever) is a challenge to the other teams.KeiKo403 wrote:... McLaren aren't stupid enough to launch a car with legality issues if they haven't had it confirmed as legal yet. Surely??
It's no coincidence that such a statement is coming from the first major team to release!
I too did think it sounded a bit like..."JB & LH are better than Vettel. The RB has a (naughty?) secret to it's pace and we've found it. Look out RBR"n smikle wrote: You see, for those who are sneaky of mind, it is obvious that saying Vettel was the secret to the RB7's speed is a sarcastic way of saying "we found out your secrets!"
I can't believe you guys didn't read it like that.
I agree 100%, however i remember Mclaren Engineers brought up some flawed stat to try to prove they had a faster car than Ferrari in 2010, when realistically it was the 3rd best car on most tracks. To much number crunching and not enough common sense, seems to be a bit of trait within the organization.Pup wrote:I don't believe an ounce of that interview.
First, the McLarens of the past few years have been anything but conservative. Secondly, while there were certainly a few races where the 26 was faster than the RB, you could hardly say that it was faster for the season as a whole, or at the end of the season. Third, we've heard enough snarky comments from McLaren about the RB to know that they do believe that Newey was up to something in Q3. And finally, I can't see anyone at McLaren outside of a few select people giving interviews to the press, much less interviews in which they praise competing drivers for getting more out of their machinery than their own, and in which they invite protests by admitting that their design is at least borderline illegal.
So I'm calling this one complete and utter BS - which is probably why it was pulled from Autosport lickety split.