I am just giving my view, jeez. Why shouldnt we quit all discussion? No one here knows how much df and drag it makes, so conversation about it would be useless.Just_a_fan wrote: Interesting. So how much downforce do think this car will make? What about drag? Where do think they can find downforce and reduce drag from the design? Do you think the car has better downforce and drag figures than the -26 or the RB8? Do you think it has a better or worse L/D than the -26 or the RB8?
I'm interested because you seem to be able to tell a lot from these few pictures and the "fact" that the car is "fat".
Quite often, yes, especially when it comes to aerodynamics. Sharp, ugly surfaces tend to create unwanted variables.xpensive wrote:Needless to say, ugly doesn't necessarily mean slow, but then if it looks right, it more often than not is right?
I think most teams will be able to slim down the rear end this year since they no longer need exhaust pipes going to the diffuser.Shaddock wrote:
I've photochopped the exhaust bulge off the 27.
In simple terms of exposed floor surface area, the 27 has the 26 and 25 easily beat. The 27's sidepod tapper starts earlier and is more pronounced.
The width (fatness) of the bodywork around the rear wheel centre line does show that the 27 is the slimest of McLearens recent cars.
Would be nice to see an overhead of last years RB and this years Caterham side by side.
They use the Toyota one as much as they can from what I hear. They have been for some time. I heard that quote from JB...sounded very promising, said with a satisfied smile tooCrucial_Xtreme wrote:Paddy Lowe said their windtunnel has seen its best days & it's time for a new one. Jenson says in the simulator the '27 is better in high speed corners. Sound like they have found some downforce.
Lowe told reporters today it's time for a new one and I believe it was said the building was either up already or going up soon.thestig84 wrote:They use the Toyota one as much as they can from what I hear. They have been for some time. I heard that quote from JB...sounded very promising, said with a satisfied smile tooCrucial_Xtreme wrote:Paddy Lowe said their windtunnel has seen its best days & it's time for a new one. Jenson says in the simulator the '27 is better in high speed corners. Sound like they have found some downforce.
The current one is what, 8 years old? Sometimes I think McLaren is also printing money in their underground lair.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Paddy Lowe said their windtunnel has seen its best days & it's time for a new one...
Lowe told reporters today it's time for a new one and I believe it was said the building was either up already or going up soon.
...
The wind tunnel has been approved. It is said it will of course be superior to the Toyota tunnel.
Paddy Lowe said that the wheelbase is still the same as last year; so I think you have to rescale that....Shaddock wrote:
I've photochopped the exhaust bulge off the 27.
In simple terms of exposed floor surface area, the 27 has the 26 and 25 easily beat. The 27's sidepod tapper starts earlier and is more pronounced.
The width (fatness) of the bodywork around the rear wheel centre line does show that the 27 is the slimest of McLearens recent cars.
Would be nice to see an overhead of last years RB and this years Caterham side by side.
Still no thoughts on this?bhallg2k wrote:Using the same principle as the now-banned EBDs, is it possible that the exhausts, as configured, create virtual flip-ups?
I think they may be doing something like that - using the exhaust to alter the airflow.bhallg2k wrote:Still no thoughts on this?bhallg2k wrote:Using the same principle as the now-banned EBDs, is it possible that the exhausts, as configured, create virtual flip-ups?
(I'm digging the undertones of disappointment within this thread. This is what Ferrari fans - at least this one - have felt for the last few years.)