Ferrari F2012

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

dren wrote:
Raptor22 wrote:The pull Rods work I guess because the suspension does'nt travel very far. With a stiff front end and and soft rear thats been the rage I guess they feel they don't have to worry too much about perfect suspension geometry.
Its a mistake I fear. Good suspension is good suspension and you can;t overcome a poor one with good aerodynamics
Just my opinion
I don't see the aero benefit from a pullrod front though.

I think he is just saying the car needs good aero and good suspension geonetry, not that the pull rods in the front provide that aero.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

munudeges wrote:I must confess I don't see the reason for the front pull-rod suspension.
Imo to place the weight lower.

Lorenzo_Bandini
Lorenzo_Bandini
11
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 12:15

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Jamesallenonf1 James Allen
#f1 There are so many legality question marks around 2012 F1 cars apparently, that FIA's Charlie Whiting is going to attend Jerez test...

User avatar
ledzep4pm
0
Joined: 21 Oct 2011, 10:21

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

dren wrote:
Raptor22 wrote:The pull Rods work I guess because the suspension does'nt travel very far. With a stiff front end and and soft rear thats been the rage I guess they feel they don't have to worry too much about perfect suspension geometry.
Its a mistake I fear. Good suspension is good suspension and you can;t overcome a poor one with good aerodynamics
Just my opinion
I don't see the aero benefit from a pullrod front though.
I'm also struggling to see an advantage. But I have had a couple of thoughts:

Possibly a lower C of G for the suspension components as they will have to be mounted differently. Also this might have made it easier for them to work in the crocodile nose.

This is just speculation, I can't see how having the higher pull rod would give a measurable advantage over the diagonal/lower push rod in terms of mass flow rate to the rear of the car or of the air quality (i.e less turbulent)
Twitter @ledzep4pm

neilbah
neilbah
14
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 20:36

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

There seems to be a rectangular duct in the front of the beam wing, the rear brake fins/ducts seem to be massively ramped diffusers from the rear

sknguy
sknguy
3
Joined: 14 Dec 2004, 21:02

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

It'll be interesting to see how the Pirellis perform with an entirely pullrod suspension, if there's any difference in attitude control at all, however subtle it might be. Would they not have an effect on something like roll center?

User avatar
amouzouris
105
Joined: 14 Feb 2011, 20:21

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

i have edited a two photos...

http://imageshack.us/f/341/ferrarif201220122150.jpg/
in this one its the f2012 side by side with the 150 italia....

http://imageshack.us/f/401/ferrarif20122thin.jpg/
and in this one i have edites out the bulges in the sidepods as someone had requested...

RacingManiac
RacingManiac
9
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 02:29

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

sknguy wrote:It'll be interesting to see how the Pirellis perform with an entirely pullrod suspension, if there's any difference in attitude control at all, however subtle it might be. Would they not have an effect on something like roll center?
Your roll center is govern primarily by your control arm...

Pull or pushrod can do the same thing given the same task mechanically speaking, however so much of F1 is driven by other concern that there may well be some differences in the end.

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

munudeges wrote:I must confess I don't see the reason for the front pull-rod suspension.
I'm thinking the same to be honest... I just don't see the benefits. Very much doubt any other cars will have front pull-rod, pretty sure Red Bull won't be running it either.

shelly
shelly
136
Joined: 05 May 2009, 12:18

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

All the changes Ferrari has made sem to be propelled by a big change in structure analysis and project. Does anybody know if, and how much, people have changed in the structures department?
twitter: @armchair_aero

User avatar
Giando
93
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 17:56
Location: Milan (Italy)

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

From my brilliant friend and compatriot Michele Dragoni, boat designer and motorsport lover...

Image

Who's talking about british-humour now? :lol:

User avatar
Ferraripilot
21
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 16:36
Location: Atlanta

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

sknguy wrote:It'll be interesting to see how the Pirellis perform with an entirely pullrod suspension, if there's any difference in attitude control at all, however subtle it might be. Would they not have an effect on something like roll center?


With less suspension movement at the front end would this tear up and/or heat the front tires further? It sounds like this suspension could allow Ferrari to establish a lower static ride height but would it be at the expense of degradation I wonder

User avatar
Redragon
19
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

http://jorgelizalde.co.uk/ferrrari/Untitled-1.jpg

Mclaren and Ferrari front view side by side.

I tried to match them but the picture of ferrari is taken from lower point of view.
But you can see the different. If mechanically Push rod and Pull rod suspension do the same.
I understand why Ferrari is using Pullrod look how clean it looks like underneath.

KevinR34
KevinR34
0
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 13:52

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Image

This looks much better with McLaren nose + rims :D Mcrrari MP4-F2012. My photoshopskills are not so high level but im happy with the result :P

Caterhamrules
Caterhamrules
0
Joined: 26 Jan 2012, 03:32

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Image