Poor form for not ensuring they had sufficient bandwidth available..Sawtooth-spike wrote:seems their web streaming is over subscribed
Poor form for not ensuring they had sufficient bandwidth available..Sawtooth-spike wrote:seems their web streaming is over subscribed
Definitely - that angle is very deceptive.wesley123 wrote:Your eyes are playing tricks, due to that it doesnt downslope and the huge undercut it seems to be fat, but it actually is pretty tight.
Just a quick reminder though – most people were saying the same about Williams last year.MIKEY_! wrote:Yes. Based on what the car looks like (which is of course all we have to go on) I think they can get 4th or 5th. And really that's not much change over last year.
True, but not me. OK now I'm just being arrogantbeelsebob wrote:Just a quick reminder though – most people were saying the same about Williams last year.MIKEY_! wrote:Yes. Based on what the car looks like (which is of course all we have to go on) I think they can get 4th or 5th. And really that's not much change over last year.
That's a bit harsh. They at times had the fourth quickest car towards the end of last season so I don't think they were catching up with last years paradigm.ringo wrote:This car looks too 2011 to me on a design detail level. I don't think it will be great.
Only seems better than the caterham. It's late to the party on a lot of features.
They are still playing catch up; nothing forward thinking on the car.