Ferrari F2012

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

radosav wrote:
Hail22 wrote:We will only see true competitive pace from every car at P2 at the Melbourne Grand Prix.

It seems Alonso is positive, Tombazis has headed back to Maranello possibly taking back some data personally to manufacturer replacements?
source?
Well its pretty obvious he went back to Maranello since no source has seen him at the track since Massa, what would he be doing at the hotel? Eating?

Its pure speculation/rumour but its the only two places he should be at the testing or in Maranello slaving away!
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

CHT
CHT
-6
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 05:24

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

scuderiafan wrote:
Hush wrote:It is going to take a while to get this car sorted. My guess is 3rd/4th race...

It doesn't help that Lotus seem really good as well. Grosjean says he has absolute confidence in the car especially in the high speed corners that even mistakes don't seem so scary.
Preseason tests mean close to nothing for performance. McLaren ran terribly in preseason last year, came out as a solid competitor to Red Bull.

Ferrari and even Mercedes looked fast in preseason, and did pretty bad for their standards.
The only reason Mclaren could recover from the last year preseason testing was because they have the EBD to copy, which itself is worth a few tenths.
It will be a lot harder to recover this season if you make a fundamental mistake with
the car design.

I know its still too early, but if Ferrari couldnt get settled in fast and put in all the miles it needs, they will most likely to start the season in the midfield.

User avatar
Spencifer_Murphy
0
Joined: 11 Apr 2004, 23:29
Location: London, England, UK

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Crucial_Xtreme wrote:No bud you weren't. I was the one quoted. But you can post with 3 quotes, so I had to delete one in order to post. Whatever. Good day.
Actually, I read his post as mocking of gilgen also. I honestly don't see how he could have been mocking you.

I know this may not seem like a "technical post" but I'm getting there with this bit: (LOL) I do find it interesting how different camera perspectives can completely change the initial view you take on a part.

In particular on this eye sore of a Ferrari (nope, I'm still not used to its hideousness yet lol) - most recently it was the turning vanes on the sidepods, then before that there was the disappearing pull-rod, prior to that there was the semi-transparent engine cover...

...somebody posted earlier about the car having a high gloss paint scheme...I doubt it is an intentional ploy by the team to help hide technical developments or anything like that, but it might well be a point that the Scuderia Rosso paint colour is one that happens to trick the eyes a bit...

...either that or the photographers are bored and are currently having a good laugh at us all lol
Silence is golden when you don't know a good answer.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:I see no reason for Ferrari to improve on their dismal performance of the last three years. I think that Merc will be closer to them than they were last year. I would prefer Merc to overtake Ferrari.
Not exactly an Earth-shattering revelation. The sky is up; water is wet; and WB is at least partially ruled by a hatred for Ferrari.

Though, I must admit, I've talked myself into being at least a little concerned. The F2012 just has so much new stuff that it's going to be murder getting it all to work and then getting it all to work together.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

And now for my contribution to the cauldron filled with transparent engine covers, phantom pullrods, and magic sidepod wings.

Am I just seeing things, or is Ferrari selectively using front/rear tires on all four corners? (Click to enlarge. Compare the top picture to the bottom one.)

Image

Image

Robbobnob
Robbobnob
33
Joined: 21 May 2010, 04:03
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

seeing things
"I continuously go further and further learning about my own limitations, my body limitations, psychological limitations. It's a way of life for me." - Ayrton Senna

Crabbia
Crabbia
9
Joined: 13 Jun 2006, 22:39
Location: ZA

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

flyboy2160 wrote:
-they should be very embarassed about the bodywork being burned up by the exhaust(on cold days in jerez to boot!) and the obvious hack job done to keep running. are you kidding me? with all their previous experience, they couldn't do a proper thermal analysis of this?
just for the record it war repaired the very next day. see below.
Image

and when was the last time you saw ferrari bodywork, or bodywork from any team for that matter, burn in a race? I can only recall reanualt last year and that was cause by engine issues.

once again. this is testing people. pump the brakes...
A wise man once told me you cant polish a turd...

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Robbobnob wrote:seeing things
That's fair enough and what I figured. Perspective changes don't usually play tricks on me like this, though.

Image

I think this is nature's way of telling me that I've had enough for the day.

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

flyboy2160 wrote:all you ferrari fan boys can keep drinking the kool aid, but i'm concerned about this radical design based on what looks like some amateurish engineering. if this stuff isn't correct and elegant after a year of develpoment, i suspect the rest of the design:

-they should be very embarassed about the bodywork being burned up by the exhaust(on cold days in jerez to boot!) and the obvious hack job done to keep running. are you kidding me? with all their previous experience, they couldn't do a proper thermal analysis of this?

-and that junior high school blunt nose step is awful. they didn't even try some elegant shaping like lotus or something clever like red bull.

i suspect they will change these before the next test or the season opener, but this opening effort has me underwhelmed.
You a Macca fan? Go check their thread, they burned a floor too.That amateurish? Also, their nose is ONLY one not raised to the maximum height.

Go Troll somewhere else.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

User avatar
amouzouris
105
Joined: 14 Feb 2011, 20:21

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Daniele M wrote:
Pierce89 wrote:
flyboy2160 wrote:all you ferrari fan boys can keep drinking the kool aid, but i'm concerned about this radical design based on what looks like some amateurish engineering. if this stuff isn't correct and elegant after a year of develpoment, i suspect the rest of the design:

-they should be very embarassed about the bodywork being burned up by the exhaust(on cold days in jerez to boot!) and the obvious hack job done to keep running. are you kidding me? with all their previous experience, they couldn't do a proper thermal analysis of this?

-and that junior high school blunt nose step is awful. they didn't even try some elegant shaping like lotus or something clever like red bull.

i suspect they will change these before the next test or the season opener, but this opening effort has me underwhelmed.
You a Macca fan? Go check their thread, they burned a floor too.That amateurish? Also, their nose is ONLY one not raised to the maximum height.

Go Troll somewhere else.
Don't feed the troll, he's afraid to go to the mclaren thread because they burned their floor so bad that it almost became liquid.
its actually not the floor that is burnt..its tire marbles falling off from the tire getting riped apart...

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Daniele M wrote:[McLaren] burned their floor so bad that it almost became liquid.
That's not entirely accurate. However, along those lines, last year's Mercedes regularly suffered burn damage to the bodywork around its engine and exhaust.

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

F. Alonso Ferrari 1:19.289

I know it should be in test thrad but I can't resist. Much beter feeling now :D
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Mr.G wrote:F. Alonso Ferrari 1:19.289

I know it should be in test thrad but I can't resist. Much beter feeling now :D
Soft tyres
More could have been done.
David Purley

Raptor22
Raptor22
26
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 22:48

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

low fuel

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

If it is Soft tyres AND low fuel, this will be an arduous season for the tifosi...
More could have been done.
David Purley