raymondu999 wrote:How do they deflect it all the way down with one suspension arm?!
Look a little bit closer, and I think you'll see a break in the middle of the line. Once you see that, it becomes a bit more apparent that you're just seeing the reflection of the drive shafts.Tozza Mazza wrote:But I can see it all the way along the main plane, and it wouldn't reflect at that point, surely?
That suspension arm wont be deflecting downwards but instead pulling the airflow upmotobaleno wrote:raymondu999 wrote:How do they deflect it all the way down with one suspension arm?!
I guess that the deflection effect could be no more than partial but maybe enough to improve performance...
It looks like a hose clamp is currently holding it in place.Robbobnob wrote:Regarding if its bonded to the suspension arm, i think you'll find if it is, it would be hard to prove it isnt structural
If you lighten the picture, you can see a band around the suspension arm, but it does not take the expected position of a hose clamp. It could well be some temperature sensing wire.Robbobnob wrote:no trace of that hose clamp here
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... e_2012.jpg
I think you're on to something here. Heat resistant material cladding the suspension is non-structural. Also, does it not mean that the suspension arm contravenes the rules because it is bodywork in the disallowed cone behind the exhaust?bhallg2k wrote:Look a little bit closer, and I think you'll see a break in the middle of the line. Once you see that, it becomes a bit more apparent that you're just seeing the reflection of the drive shafts.Tozza Mazza wrote:But I can see it all the way along the main plane, and it wouldn't reflect at that point, surely?
I threw this out earlier in the thread. In light of that article, I'll throw it out again to sample some more opinions.
10.3.4 Non‐structural parts of suspension members are considered bodywork.
So, if the article is right about the RB8 suspension directing exhaust, does that make its heat shield moveable aero?