Red Bull RB8 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

bonjon1979 wrote:I think you're on to something here. Heat resistant material cladding the suspension is non-structural. Also, does it not mean that the suspension arm contravenes the rules because it is bodywork in the disallowed cone behind the exhaust?
All entirely sprung parts of the car in contact with the external air stream, except cameras, camera housings and the parts definitely associated with the mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission and running gear. Airboxes, radiators and engine exhausts are considered to be part of the bodywork.
Suspension isn't bodywork.

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Those stripes are heat sensitive paint and yes there is also some flo-viz scattered about as well...the stripes are to see how hot that area is getting. Changes color with different temps. imo
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

User avatar
motobaleno
11
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 13:58

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Robbobnob wrote:
motobaleno wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:How do they deflect it all the way down with one suspension arm?! :shock:

I guess that the deflection effect could be no more than partial but maybe enough to improve performance...
That suspension arm wont be deflecting downwards but instead pulling the airflow up

Image

like this

Image

Regarding if its bonded to the suspension arm, i think you'll find if it is, it would be hard to prove it isnt structural

Actually your argument seems strong but I thought that, according to the new regulations, it will be easy to blow gas upper: just pointing exhaust exit up! the problem is to blow gas lower isn't it right?

RB7ate9
RB7ate9
2
Joined: 13 Jul 2011, 03:03

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Perhaps the suspension arm that does work will be the rear ones?

Based on the photo of the exhaust, it seems like the volume of air coming down from the side pods and engine cover would help to push the exhaust plume downwards at higher speed towards the rear upper suspension arm. It could then be that the rear upper arm helps to direct the exhaust the diffuser or to the underside of the beam wing more directly, though the usefulness of directing high energy air to the topside of the diffuser is not as apparent to me as perhaps some other folks on the forum.

Taking into account Robbobnob's drawing, it could be that the rear suspension arm is attempting to direct as much air to the beam wing as possible.

edit: Redacted statement about rear-upper suspension arm being lower than the forward arm, it appears to be a trick of perspective.
Last edited by RB7ate9 on 15 Feb 2012, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.

thestig84
thestig84
10
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

strad wrote:Those stripes are heat sensitive paint and yes there is also some flo-viz scattered about as well...the stripes are to see how hot that area is getting. Changes color with different temps. imo
Im afraid I agree with Crucial_Xtreme. They look like clamps to me.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

They're metal cable ties, looks like.

Image
#58

bonjon1979
bonjon1979
30
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 17:16

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

beelsebob wrote:
bonjon1979 wrote:I think you're on to something here. Heat resistant material cladding the suspension is non-structural. Also, does it not mean that the suspension arm contravenes the rules because it is bodywork in the disallowed cone behind the exhaust?
All entirely sprung parts of the car in contact with the external air stream, except cameras, camera housings and the parts definitely associated with the mechanical functioning of the engine, transmission and running gear. Airboxes, radiators and engine exhausts are considered to be part of the bodywork.
Suspension isn't bodywork.
Look at this article that was quoted earlier:


10.3.4 Non‐structural parts of suspension members are considered bodywork.

Heat shielding is non-structural.

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

bonjon1979 wrote:10.3.4 Non‐structural parts of suspension members are considered bodywork.

Heat shielding is non-structural.
"can be", not "is".
#58

Robbobnob
Robbobnob
33
Joined: 21 May 2010, 04:03
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

That regulation was to stop wings mounted to the unsprung parts of the cars.

Also each wishbone member also has a wheel tether, which is attached to the wishbone with a nonstructural shroud for aero purposes. tTherefore Red Bull can easily argue that the heat shielding is primarily for safety, and if they are told to remove it they then could argue that every other team is in violation of the regulations for having a nonstructural bodywork on their suspension and therefore moveable aero
"I continuously go further and further learning about my own limitations, my body limitations, psychological limitations. It's a way of life for me." - Ayrton Senna

User avatar
MIKEY_!
7
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Robbobnob wrote:Mikey the scale involved for a wind tunnel big enough to house a font wing (2 meters diameter atleast) capable of 300 kph+ certainly wouldn't be portable.
Image
Image

University of Florida has this hurricane simulator. It manages 200 kph+ over this rather large area - and - it goes on a trailer! Bolt a venturi on the end of that and I think the right speed can be achieved.

The rigid core idea only fixes some of the problem (not flexy noses or pylons) and the flaps can still flex down to reduce drag.

The parts under the wing will seal it to some extent which could increase DF if they aren't tall enough, otherwise a good option (and lots easier).

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

MIKEY_! wrote:
Robbobnob wrote:Mikey the scale involved for a wind tunnel big enough to house a font wing (2 meters diameter atleast) capable of 300 kph+ certainly wouldn't be portable.
Image
Image

University of Florida has this hurricane simulator. It manages 200 kph+ over this rather large area - and - it goes on a trailer! Bolt a venturi on the end of that and I think the right speed can be achieved.

The rigid core idea only fixes some of the problem (not flexy noses or pylons) and the flaps can still flex down to reduce drag.

The parts under the wing will seal it to some extent which could increase DF if they aren't tall enough, otherwise a good option (and lots easier).
I....Want....one of these...
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Hail22 wrote:I....Want....one of these...
Troublesome neighbors?

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

timbo wrote:
Hail22 wrote:I....Want....one of these...
Troublesome neighbors?
Either that or pesky birds. That will keep a car free of bird poop (and possible inverted).


I think the heat shields on the RB8 are easily non-structural, else they wouldn't be held on by hose clamps. However, I doubt they'll be fastened in such a way once the season starts.

Even though I really want the heat shielding to be considered bodywork and thus moveable aero, everyone on that team is too smart to leave any doubts by just lazily strapping on a heat shield when it counts.

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

bhallg2k wrote:
timbo wrote:
Hail22 wrote:I....Want....one of these...
Troublesome neighbors?
Either that or pesky birds. That will keep a car free of bird poop (and possible inverted).


I think the heat shields on the RB8 are easily non-structural, else they wouldn't be held on by hose clamps. However, I doubt they'll be fastened in such a way once the season starts.

Even though I really want the heat shielding to be considered bodywork and thus moveable aero, everyone on that team is too smart to leave any doubts by just lazily strapping on a heat shield when it counts.
*slips cheque to the FIA*

Billion dollar drinks company strikes again! but no i would want one to test the aero effeciency/deficiency xD

Also want to build a single seater some day ^^
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

User avatar
ledzep4pm
0
Joined: 21 Oct 2011, 10:21

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

bhallg2k wrote:
timbo wrote:
Hail22 wrote:I....Want....one of these...
Troublesome neighbors?
Either that or pesky birds. That will keep a car free of bird poop (and possible inverted).


I think the heat shields on the RB8 are easily non-structural, else they wouldn't be held on by hose clamps. However, I doubt they'll be fastened in such a way once the season starts.

Even though I really want the heat shielding to be considered bodywork and thus moveable aero, everyone on that team is too smart to leave any doubts by just lazily strapping on a heat shield when it counts.
Maybe they just strap them on during testing so they can quickly change the shape/ level of heat shielding. They can then quickly optimise the part for weight (and the way it controls the plume. Once they are happy just manufacture the wishbone with the shielding included so it is then classed as structural.
Twitter @ledzep4pm