Team: Adrian Newey (CTO), Petr Prodromou (CA), Rob Marshall (CD), Christian Horner (TP) Drivers: Sebastian Vettel (1), Mark Webber (2), Sebastian Buemi (reserve)
A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
RB7ate9 wrote:Apologies for the totally random site. I don't have an online image account and this was the first thing that came to mind to get my thoughts on here.
This construction is simple but genius. So the secret about the letterbox is covered up! I think it isn´t possible to copy that in short time...
I agree, I think the thinness of the letterbox betrays the fact that the volume flow rate through there is much higher and more direct than placing a hole in the front of the nose that will lose more energy by the time it gets to the cockpit.
Holm86: Roger that. Brazil 2011.
Edit: Gave Indication of when the photo was taken
Ok but I think they changed the position of it. Have a look right there at the area left and right from the drivers helmet:
I'm quite surprised by this.
Red Bull haven't used one of those central supports for years and last year a lot of teams copied their DRS system with the pod in the centre of the main plane.
This looks similar to what McLaren and Ferrari ran at the beginning of last year.
What would be the reason for changing to the central support?
Last edited by Richard on 24 Feb 2012, 12:03, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:Removed image quoted from post above
Is there a thread or article that compares the effectiveness of reducing drag between DRS and a fully-developed F-duct (i.e. Mclaren's at end of 2010)?
Interesting. You don't often see Red Bull copying a Ferrari concept (DRS/wing pillar).
RB7ate9 wrote:I agree, I think the thinness of the letterbox betrays the fact that the volume flow rate through there is much higher and more direct than placing a hole in the front of the nose that will lose more energy by the time it gets to the cockpit.
How is the air being diverted from the letter box to the drivers pod?
I see no specific holes behind the letter box slots except for two circular tubes and the semi blocked space behind the fluid (brake/somethign else) containers.
kris wrote:How is the air being diverted from the letter box to the drivers pod?
I see no specific holes behind the letter box slots except for two circular tubes and the semi blocked space behind the fluid (brake/somethign else) containers.
It is eben more interesting seeing rbr using a ferrari concept that ferrari has abandoned some months ago in order to use redbull concept. The swapping is very interesting.
What I think is this: they have gone to the central pillar mounting in order to have more shaping freedom on the rear wing endplates.
With no pillar, the endplates are carrying all the load, and thus have to be structurally strong and fail proof. If there is a pillar carrying the load instead, you have more freedom in developing strange shapes of the endplates, especially if you think about interaction between vortices developed from the wing tips and maybe the exhausts.
So this arrangement with pillar and conventional looking endplates is just a first step. I excpect new endplates to come out in next test or in melbourne