anyone else notice the tip of the nose?
That's a wheel slip sensor used during testing.Oneshortplanck wrote:[...] and the blue thing just behind the front wheel
Given the Ferrari 599 GTB's "flying" C-pillar, I think someone's going to have a few questions for his team tonight.TBone wrote:[...] Ferrari are obviously trying to do the same thing but haven't extended the bodywork to the floor
Mark probably said exactly what he was going to say regardless of what he felt or what figures they saw from the data either way.radosav wrote:webber isn't pleased with it
Me thinks it's a ride height laser sensorOneshortplanck wrote: and the blue thing just behind the front wheel
I don't know you guys, but to me, this redefines 'tight'.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:In this picture it looks like air/gasses can get to the sides of the diffuser by rear tyre.
http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 574841.jpg
1) What is your basis for this judgement? Looks?Shrieker wrote:I don't know you guys, but to me, this redefines 'tight'.
I'm not so sure it does, it looks like the bridge is designed to curl the exhaust flow over the side and keep it hugging the side panel (of the bridge), heading in a virtual straight shot to the sides of the diffuser.hardingfv32 wrote:But why move the outlet farther away if you are targeting the sides of the diffuser? The exhaust plume must diffuse the farther out you get.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:In this picture it looks like air/gasses can get to the sides of the diffuser by rear tyre.
Brian
1) It looks like last years car to me except for some details and the exhaust.Shrieker wrote:It looks tighter and has caught me by surprise quite frankly. Surely, aerodynamically speaking, tighter is better isn't it ?
Good thought.PhillipM wrote:The slot underneath is just to keep the air flowing across the floor in inside to stop the exhaust gas being drawn there amongst other things.
Eh? The 2009 RB5 already had pull-rod.hardingfv32 wrote:Last year it was pull rod suspension that made for a major improvement in tightness.