If its based on Tyre management Button is by far the best in that field.raymondu999 wrote:I think most are shying away due to the very different requirements and nature of the circuit. I think this is the litmus test for the Red Bull vs McLaren fight. Since Spain last year the McLaren is equal - or maybe even a bit better in the fast corner circuits; and better than the Red Bull in the race. Maybe not in terms of outright race pace - but in terms of tyre conservation; at least
I think Lotus have quite a good tyre conservation as well.raymondu999 wrote:I think probably Button and Vettel are the best on tyre conservation while keeping good pace; at least since last year.
I'm gonna go on a limb and say both of those drivers are going to go on the podium.
Forget a DSLR and camera, I want to know how to be one of Hail's clients!Hail22 wrote:If your willing to pay my boss for the time lost with clients >.<banibhusan wrote:That's freaking awesome dude. Make sure you have a DSLR with you and take some wonderful pics. We'll be waiting for your collection.Hail22 wrote: Six races Ray.
After Malaysia its back home
Then back on the horse again for Canada, Silverstone.
Break then Monza, Abu Dhabi.
most of the Grand Prixs save Monza (family visit and Grand Prix in one) are all for clientel/work reasons.
I will do the best I can for the forums but I cannot stray from my original reasons for being at these events. xD
Or at least work where hail is working.raymondu999 wrote: Forget a DSLR and camera, I want to know how to be one of Hail's clients!
Hmm, in full wet I'd be betting heavily on Hamilton in a very fast McLaren. In drying or damp conditions, Button every time.Hemsy wrote:Thunderstorms expected for the Malaysian GP! A wet race + Button at the wheel of a very fast Mclaren means it's a no-brainer as to who is most likely to win.
+1beelsebob wrote:Hmm, in full wet I'd be betting heavily on Hamilton in a very fast McLaren. In drying or damp conditions, Button every time.
I don't think it's as clear cut in either case. Hamilton will have the speed edge on Button in slippery conditions full stop, IMHO he's the best on the grid in tricky conditions, BUT he will also wear through the tyres more quickly. We saw that last year a couple of times, initially Hamilton was a lot faster but then started to fall back towards Button as he started to burn through the tyres. I think that's why Button can appear better in drying conditions, it is then that the tyres start to overheat and wear, and Button will get better life out of them.beelsebob wrote:Hmm, in full wet I'd be betting heavily on Hamilton in a very fast McLaren. In drying or damp conditions, Button every time.Hemsy wrote:Thunderstorms expected for the Malaysian GP! A wet race + Button at the wheel of a very fast Mclaren means it's a no-brainer as to who is most likely to win.
Will it though, in a full wet situation? In full wet I don't think we have ever seen any such thing.myurr wrote:BUT he will also wear through the tyres more quickly.
Actually I think Vettel is still the best on the grid - he seems to be able to extract all the pace he wants without wearing the tyres. Button is next best in this regard, but doesn't have the same ultimate pace. These Pirelli tyres just perfectly match Vettel's driving style giving him quite the advantage.Hail22 wrote:If its based on Tyre management Button is by far the best in that field.raymondu999 wrote:I think most are shying away due to the very different requirements and nature of the circuit. I think this is the litmus test for the Red Bull vs McLaren fight. Since Spain last year the McLaren is equal - or maybe even a bit better in the fast corner circuits; and better than the Red Bull in the race. Maybe not in terms of outright race pace - but in terms of tyre conservation; at least
I have my gonads on the line, hopefully some other chaps will join in on the hunt!