Ferrari F2012

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
radosav
radosav
23
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:46

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Agasthya wrote:
radosav wrote:i watched race again yesterday. first 25 laps race pace of F2012 wasn't so bad. F2012 was faster on medium tyres than mercedes on softs. on lap 20 hamilton with free track wasn't much ahead of alonso behind vettel and rosberg.
I think the Ferrari is relatively good with lots of fuel on board but it struggles a lot in low fuel/qualifying trim. Alonso lost a lot amount of time to the leading four cars in the final 15 laps of the Australian race.

I also agree with your assessment that the Ferrari is probably faster than the Mercedes right now. The issue will be that the Merc is so much faster in qualifying trim and therefore will be significantly up the road at the early parts of the races, when the Ferrari is the strongest. Alonso needs to make amazing starts to have a chance of mixing it up with the Mercedes right now.

Hopefully they bring some sort of revised package to Shanghai.
i must say that their advantage to the rest of the field are fastest pitstops and fast first lap after the pitstop. that is how alonso left rosberg and webber behind him after first pit stops. i can't wait to see how will ferrari behave with tyres and how long tyres will hold the grip in sepang.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

The shape of that nose is beginning to annoy me, has that goulish thing ever seen the inside of a windtunnel in search for less resistance, it looks more like it was penciled to make sure the entire car would be travelling through turbulence at speed?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

Agasthya
Agasthya
0
Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 23:26

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

radosav wrote:
Agasthya wrote:
radosav wrote:i watched race again yesterday. first 25 laps race pace of F2012 wasn't so bad. F2012 was faster on medium tyres than mercedes on softs. on lap 20 hamilton with free track wasn't much ahead of alonso behind vettel and rosberg.
I think the Ferrari is relatively good with lots of fuel on board but it struggles a lot in low fuel/qualifying trim. Alonso lost a lot amount of time to the leading four cars in the final 15 laps of the Australian race.

I also agree with your assessment that the Ferrari is probably faster than the Mercedes right now. The issue will be that the Merc is so much faster in qualifying trim and therefore will be significantly up the road at the early parts of the races, when the Ferrari is the strongest. Alonso needs to make amazing starts to have a chance of mixing it up with the Mercedes right now.

Hopefully they bring some sort of revised package to Shanghai.
i must say that their advantage to the rest of the field are fastest pitstops and fast first lap after the pitstop. that is how alonso left rosberg and webber behind him after first pit stops. i can't wait to see how will ferrari behave with tyres and how long tyres will hold the grip in sepang.
Pirelli are bringing the hard and medium tire to Malaysia so it should be okay for Ferrari (I hope)

timbo
timbo
113
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

.poz wrote:Heavier car = less pitch change on corner exit.
How so? :)

David1976
David1976
0
Joined: 16 Mar 2011, 18:22

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Gills

Image

RW detail
Image

driver cooling
Image

Image

Turning vanes
Image

Exhaust
Image

Steering wheel
Image
Is it me or does this year's F1 Ferrari have the fit and finish of an old '80's FIAT?

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

It appears to have, hell, the Mclaren and Redbull look like they're from a different series in terms of fit + finish.

User avatar
CmdrVOODOO
1
Joined: 25 Jan 2012, 20:35
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

PhillipM wrote:It appears to have, hell, the Mclaren and Redbull look like they're from a different series in terms of fit + finish.
It looks like something I could do at my house. :lol:

My thought is the fit and finish is so bad because they're just doing some patch work on this car to get it through until they roll out the new version in a few weeks. If they're talking about having to do a crash test, I don't see them spending a lot of time with fit and finish because it's all a short-term solution.

User avatar
Marc.W
26
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 14:08
Location: Belfast, N.I

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

The F2012 looks like it's been put together by a 5 year old with some pritt stick!

User avatar
Vanja #66
1686
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

OK, guys, seriously now... Reason for new parts looking badly manufactured is because they were built in a hurry and with less personnel, since most of them are busy with development for Barcelona... What did you expect, they said 3 days ago that there aren't going to be any new parts, and here we see some small high temperature-adjusting ones.
"If anyone was to ask for my opinion, which, I note, they're not..." - The Fellowship

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
MBilcke
1
Joined: 22 Mar 2012, 13:55
Location: Ypres, Belgium

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:OK, guys, seriously now... Reason for new parts looking badly manufactured is because they were built in a hurry and with less personnel, since most of them are busy with development for Barcelona... What did you expect, they said 3 days ago that there aren't going to be any new parts, and here we see some small high temperature-adjusting ones.
That has to be an extreem hurry then, I can cut a wooden plank more flat and smooth than that snorkle or those gills, or are they recycling last years parts?

User avatar
Vanja #66
1686
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

MBilcke wrote: That has to be an extreem hurry then, I can cut a wooden plank more flat and smooth than that snorkle or those gills, or are they recycling last years parts?
Cant comment on your wood-working skills, but the idea is interesting... Wont cost them too much track time, but would save some resources and development time. Painful damage reduction... 8-[
"If anyone was to ask for my opinion, which, I note, they're not..." - The Fellowship

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

More pics from today. Right click>view image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
MBilcke wrote: That has to be an extreem hurry then, I can cut a wooden plank more flat and smooth than that snorkle or those gills, or are they recycling last years parts?
Cant comment on your wood-working skills, but the idea is interesting... Wont cost them too much track time, but would save some resources and development time. Painful damage reduction... 8-[
When we're talking about the majority of the field being within 1 to 2 percent of each other then this kind of fit and finish may be a big deal. It's not just that the panel gaps and poorly fitting aero devices cause a bit of turbulence and friction because of the shoddy build quality, you also have to factor in that the aero parts on the car are not positioned exactly where they should be. Lots of tiny errors can compound into a big aero problem in a system where so many complex parts are designed to interact precisely with each other. This is, after all, why the Acer ducts are still there. Simply chopping them off would require down stream aero changes and changes to the internal aero and cooling system, so it's better to leave them in place until a full solution can be worked out even though the exhausts have been moved.

Now that may not be too much of a problem if your aero is already misbehaving and is not correlating with the wind tunnel. But this certainly isn't going to help with correlation.

Th0R
Th0R
0
Joined: 28 Feb 2012, 23:53
Location: Germany

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

myurr wrote:
Vanja #66 wrote:
MBilcke wrote: ...
Now that may not be too much of a problem if your aero is already misbehaving and is not correlating with the wind tunnel. But this certainly isn't going to help with correlation.
Since the wind tunnel models may be manufactured by the same people, there could be the same gaps and bad finishs in the models. Therefore, correlation might not be a problem :lol:

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

.poz wrote:I think the problem is in aerodynamic/pitch sensitivity. The car go better with full load of fuel. Heavier car = less pitch change on corner exit. If the problem is in the front suspension imho shouldn't the car go better with less weight ?
For as long as pitch sensitivity and porpoising have been known to be massively detrimental to aero cars, it would surprise me to be caught out like that. Would show up pretty blatantly in an aero map, no?

I still thing there were a number of cars caught out with crap handling at Albert Park. It's one thing to be slow because you no longer have quite as much downforce with a blown diffuser, but for the balance and handling to be unpredictable on multiple cars makes me wonder about tires.

But hey, who knows. Probably a combination of things. We'll see in Malaysia.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.