Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

Shrieker wrote:Attack is what an afraid beast does.
Scared beasts aren't the only things that attack.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
Guisson
2
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 12:59
Location: Erlangen, Germany.

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... SGtU#t=43s

Seb's Error no doubt Nk's Trajectory was linear seb cut off in front of him.
Similar to the " strike" in Turkey 2010
The task is,not so much to see what no one has yet seenbut to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Erwin Schrödinger

GrizzleBoy
GrizzleBoy
33
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 04:06

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
Giblet wrote:He did leave room, but Vettel thought he was already past.
Vettel was going straight - and left a car's width to his left.
Vettel was cutting diagonally across the racing line.

I have it saved on Sky+ and front the front view, you can see clearly the racing line.

Vettel had more than enough space on track and Karthikeyan let him through, but he chose to cut across both the racing line and the HRTs front wing.

User avatar
Shrieker
13
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 23:41

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
Shrieker wrote:Attack is what an afraid beast does.
Scared beasts aren't the only things that attack.
I attacked no one - if you consider bringing a reasonable opinion to public attention is an attack then so be it. What I see is that you guys very much try to refrain from commenting on the dark side of F1.

But why ?
Education is that which allows a nation free, independent, reputable life, and function as a high society; or it condemns it to captivity and poverty.
-Atatürk

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

Shrieker wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:
Shrieker wrote:Attack is what an afraid beast does.
Scared beasts aren't the only things that attack.
I attacked no one - if you consider bringing a reasonable opinion to public attention is an attack then so be it. What I see is that you guys very much try to refrain from commenting on the dark side of F1.

But why ?
Your reasonable opinion became a "forced" one after you could not respect the majorities view, face it we aren't all going to follow your pattern of thought.

Just let it go and drop your pride, your entitled to your opinion have been respected, but now your force feeding us, which your just losing respect from the community.

Who is looking forward to the Communist...errrhmmm Chinese Grand Prix?
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

User avatar
Guisson
2
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 12:59
Location: Erlangen, Germany.

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

I'm looking forward to an aggressive Vettel the Next GP !
He will certainly challenge for the win !
Hope also the GP won't be counterfeit ..haha[Joke]
The task is,not so much to see what no one has yet seenbut to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Erwin Schrödinger

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EAcNPOSGtU[/youtube]
if you looked at the replay on 0:52, Karthikeyan makes a distinct rigthward swerve.
Shrieker wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:
Shrieker wrote:Attack is what an afraid beast does.
Scared beasts aren't the only things that attack.
I attacked no one - if you consider bringing a reasonable opinion to public attention is an attack then so be it. What I see is that you guys very much try to refrain from commenting on the dark side of F1.

But why ?
I didn't say it was an attack. You put in an analogy of beasts attacking. I only responded to your analogy.
Hail22 wrote:Who is looking forward to the Communist...errrhmmm Chinese Grand Prix?
Now that's below the belt. What have you got against my country?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

Well, I would like to say that I misread the incident, that was for sure NK's fault.

Sorry WB. I tip my hat.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: Ferrari F2012

Post

Ferrari F2012. Looks like new FW works ok. car post. :D

Image

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
Hail22 wrote:Who is looking forward to the Communist...errrhmmm Chinese Grand Prix?
Now that's below the belt. What have you got against my country?
Oh come on, don't go all politically correct on me...China is one of the last Communist nations nothing wrong with acknolwedging that fact, if it wasn't for communism China wouldn't be the 2nd wealthiest economy in the world.

So you should in fact take it as a compliment, the Russians failed communism miserably....
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

stefan_ wrote:
vall wrote:
NathanOlder wrote:Martin Whitmash just saying they had to hold Lewis in the pit as Massa was heading down the pit lane.
this seems starge to me. The crew was ready, the lolipop was up, but LH waited for few seconds..... How they held him?
Radio?

it was clear on the replay that the red/green light they have instead of a lolipop
was red for those few seconds he waited

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

Hail22 wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:
Hail22 wrote:Who is looking forward to the Communist...errrhmmm Chinese Grand Prix?
Now that's below the belt. What have you got against my country?
Oh come on, don't go all politically correct on me...China is one of the last Communist nations nothing wrong with acknolwedging that fact, if it wasn't for communism China wouldn't be the 2nd wealthiest economy in the world.

So you should in fact take it as a compliment, the Russians failed communism miserably....
I'm not. My home country IS still communist. And it will probably stay that way for a lot longer. But my beef was against your singling out the Chinese GP as the "Communist GP"
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

I agree with the cucumber remark. The sooner they get rid of him the better.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

I don't understand the cucumber reference. Can someone help me out?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
motobaleno
11
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 13:58

Re: Malaysian GP 2012 - Sepang International Circuit

Post

Shrieker wrote:
vall wrote:Nonsense!

Called "pathetic" a second time for putting forth my opinion in a civilised manner, never mind other insults.

But why can't you guys keep civilised ?

not to insult is only the first step of civilization.
I acknowloedge that you did insult anyone (at least IN the thread) buy I don't find at all your posts as civilized.
you presented a VERY subjective interpretation as a plain objective truth and pretend that everyone acknowledge it...
that's not civilised: actually that's typical of fundamenatalistic thinking.
A civilized way to present your opinion would have sounded like
"guys i know that I don't have the smallest proof of what I'm saying and that's hard to believe but IMHO perez went off on purpose"