Pup wrote:Does anyone blame Indy for that? I know that there's a Max camp and a Michelin camp, but I don't remember anyone blaming IMS. Honest question, I just don't remember. I do know that despite it being a long dead issue, people still get huffy about. So maybe we shouldn't dig it back up lest we start attracting flies.
To me, the only issue with CotA is their deal with Tavo. Everything else just seems to be rumor that seems to either come from leftover resentment from that deal or from local politics. There's never been any actual evidence that they are behind on construction or incompetent in any of their other dealings. It's all 100% speculation and bias.
They are sharks, no doubt. And with the Tavo deal, I'm of two minds. Yeah, they probably did him wrong, but then again Tavo probably had a chance to find a place within the organization and decided to fight it out instead. Just my opinion of course, and maybe we'll never know.
I do like the other risks that CotA has been willing to take. I like the fact that they were willing to halt construction of their project in a face off with Bernie. I like the fact that Bernie is none too pleased with them. I like that they're making bold gambles on ticket demand, and indeed in building the track itself. It's all very stereotypically Texas and I wouldn't have it any other way, really.
I mean, we've got what, 127 pages of talk about this race already. When has any other venue attracted this much attention and scrutiny? It's been a great show already, and they haven't even put down the asphalt.
Returning to the topic at hand, I think it's safe (and reasonable) to say that the events of the 2005 USGP soiled everyone involved to varying degrees. It's a classic case of guilt by association, because reasonable-sounding arguments can be made to support the guilt of pretty much anyone you want to blame.
That doesn't make those judgments fair one way or another, and I cannot emphasize that enough. It's just the nature of the beast inherent to any polarizing event.
And for what it's worth, the fact that the Indy USGPs were never really that good doesn't exactly help matters either.
(For the sake of clarity, I don't wish to bring that topic up again. I only refer to it now as a character witness, so to speak.)
All of that is to say that CotA has quite a bit to live down with regard to restoring the lustre of the USGP, and they're not doing a very good job of it yet. Even if it's all the result of lies, hearsay, or anything else, an appropriate and effective PR response - skills, by the way, absolutely demanded of any entity seeking or dealing with sponsorships, where appearance means everything - could mute many of the criticisms being leveled that way. That it's not happening does seem to lend weight to those who say this entire thing is completely disorganized.
I
want this race to happen. But, I'm not holding my breath.