I do not see why it shouldn't.hardingfv32 wrote:Pinch points... what evidence do we have that they exist on the RW? I have a CFD sim that does not indicate any pressure buildup at say the end plates junctions.
That is why I wonder what the fences are for. I do not see why the flow should want to move sideways on the wing surface. could there be a concern with yaw conditions?
Brian
I bet your next post after I the correct the angle of attach is going to be "but it is not the whole car!"Lycoming wrote:Not really comparable. The foil in the CFD doesn't have nearly the amount of camber or the same angle of attack.
Probably true, but Brian that doesn't mean this analysis is representative of modern day(2011-2012) Rear Wings.hardingfv32 wrote:Lycoming wrote:Not really comparable. The foil in the CFD doesn't have nearly the amount of camber or the same angle of attack.
Well I hate to burst your bubble but this is as good a sim as you are going to find on this area of the car. Please feel free to post a sim that demonstrates the angle of attach matters. I would be thrilled to see it, as it toke a lot of effort to find the one I posted.
Brian
The gills are to bleed out air from the high pressure region above the wing to weaken the tip vortices... their orientation and alignment is critical and teams vary this...Lycoming wrote:Not really comparable. The foil in the CFD doesn't have nearly the amount of camber or the same angle of attack.
just curious, what is the "common" explanation fort he louvres?