Yeah that' what it looks like.hardingfv32 wrote:What would the team be adjusting with this setup? Are they just verifying that the splitter would pass the test if required?
Brian
[img]http://www.formula1.com/wi/0x0/sutton/2 ... 83.jpg[img]
Yeah that' what it looks like.hardingfv32 wrote:What would the team be adjusting with this setup? Are they just verifying that the splitter would pass the test if required?
Brian
[img]http://www.formula1.com/wi/0x0/sutton/2 ... 83.jpg[img]
This seems like a well developed area for any type of racing that requires single nut wheel changes. We are talking about a number of decades and something the is very easy to model. I find it odd that baring the introduction of new materials, that there is much new in this area of the car.Chuckjr wrote: Indeed it is. Having half or 1/3rd the turns cuts time and the thicker threads would tend to be less susceptible to cross threading...Macca could learn something in this.
Elegant, and also a little funny; so simple a solution that nobody noticed yet. I associate to the thanks list for Crucial.Chuckjr wrote:Indeed it is. Having half or 1/3rd the turns cuts time and the thicker threads would tend to be less susceptible to cross threading...Macca could learn something in this.dren wrote:That was a good observation by Scarbs. Are the wheels homoligated at the start of the season? This looks like something the other teams would be able to easily jump on.
Well done Crucial--as always.
as I understand you are obliged to have a nut securing the wheel .But who said it needs to be a thread? having less thread is putting more load on what is still there.hardingfv32 wrote:This seems like a well developed area for any type of racing that requires single nut wheel changes. We are talking about a number of decades and something the is very easy to model. I find it odd that baring the introduction of new materials, that there is much new in this area of the car.Chuckjr wrote: Indeed it is. Having half or 1/3rd the turns cuts time and the thicker threads would tend to be less susceptible to cross threading...Macca could learn something in this.
I would put it down to a different mix of benefits verses risks.
Brian
What's going on at the trailing edge of the DRS flap? I see the very obvious gurney, but what about all the other steps?Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Today in Bahrain
...
Do you have any source for that?hardingfv32 wrote:Just as a side note: The Gurney on the flap adds around 20% extra downforce to the second element.
Brian
I remember that I was impressed by the number. I believe it is in this report:Owen.C93 wrote:Do you have any source for that?
That was fascinating thankyou. One calculation showed a 20% increase in DF with 8% increase in drag which was pretty beneficial.hardingfv32 wrote:I remember that I was impressed by the number. I believe it is in this report:Owen.C93 wrote:Do you have any source for that?
GOFAST-1 Final Report
AER E 462: Design of Aerospace Systems
Professor: Dr. Steve Holland
Advisor: Dr. Dale Chimenti
Client: Mr. Matthew Orris, Lockheed Martin Corporation
4/17/2010
Note how the downforce numbers of the second element are almost equal to the drag number. Nothing efficient about the RW second elements at high AoA.Owen.C93 wrote: One calculation showed a 20% increase in DF with 8% increase in drag which was pretty beneficial.
James Allen reporting that their speed is also down to new jacks:Chuckjr wrote:Indeed it is. Having half or 1/3rd the turns cuts time and the thicker threads would tend to be less susceptible to cross threading...Macca could learn something in this.dren wrote:That was a good observation by Scarbs. Are the wheels homoligated at the start of the season? This looks like something the other teams would be able to easily jump on.