Because the more money and reputation Maldonado costs williams, the more like Bottas will be sat in a williams next year.FrukostScones wrote:jdlive wrote:Great news for Bottas yet again! GO BOTTAS!
why is this good news for Bottas?
Because the more money and reputation Maldonado costs williams, the more like Bottas will be sat in a williams next year.FrukostScones wrote:jdlive wrote:Great news for Bottas yet again! GO BOTTAS!
why is this good news for Bottas?
Good news for Bottas would be cancellation of PDVSA money for Maldonado.beelsebob wrote:Because the more money and reputation Maldonado costs williams, the more like Bottas will be sat in a williams next year.FrukostScones wrote:jdlive wrote:Great news for Bottas yet again! GO BOTTAS!
why is this good news for Bottas?
I don't think so tbh.mx_tifoso wrote:Certainly killing someone is a slight exaggeration, no? Just plenty of DNF's for those around him and himself. But it's just painful to see the last video since it's such a stupid mistake, but yet it is textbook Maldonado.
But I do agree that his super license should be revoked, especially if his shunting extravaganza continues.
What a complete toolbag. At this point I'd rather have Narain Karthikeyan in my car. At least when he loops the car late in a race while alone and down by three laps he has the decency to not RUN INTO A CURB.imightbewrong wrote:Here is a better view.. It looks.. well, just stupid
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsbatI8QKOg[/youtube]
mx_tifoso wrote:Certainly killing someone is a slight exaggeration, no?
[...]
Being that it is Venezuela, the government likely would have said the person had a fatal heart attack and died seconds before actually being struck by Maldonado's car...that is had they been struck.bhallg2k wrote:Nope. He wasn't all that far from doing it here.mx_tifoso wrote:Certainly killing someone is a slight exaggeration, no?
[...]
I would throw a lead plated gauntlet at his head if he dared to attempt an "extreme" overtake.SeijaKessen wrote:
But given how fast of a circuit Spa is, would you feel comfortable with him near you heading down into Eau Rouge or up into Raidillon?
Sorry - but I can't pass that one - statistics and probability don't work that way. Just because I toss a head, doesn't make a tail more likely the next time around. The more someone crashes, the more likely that a serious crash is within a given time frame (e.g. a season or a career).GrizzleBoy wrote:For every crash a driver survives, the probability of the next one being fatal rises just a little more.
Don't apologise – this is a technical forum, best to point out the technical inaccuracies.QLDriver wrote:Sorry - but I can't pass that one - statistics and probability don't work that way. Just because I toss a head, doesn't make a tail more likely the next time around. The more someone crashes, the more likely that a serious crash is within a given time frame (e.g. a season or a career).GrizzleBoy wrote:For every crash a driver survives, the probability of the next one being fatal rises just a little more.
Not that I disagree with the sentiment about him being dangerous, but dealing with statistics all the time does this to you!
If every crash causes him to be more brash then it could increase the probability.QLDriver wrote:Sorry - but I can't pass that one - statistics and probability don't work that way. Just because I toss a head, doesn't make a tail more likely the next time around. The more someone crashes, the more likely that a serious crash is within a given time frame (e.g. a season or a career).GrizzleBoy wrote:For every crash a driver survives, the probability of the next one being fatal rises just a little more.
Not that I disagree with the sentiment about him being dangerous, but dealing with statistics all the time does this to you!