Mercedes AMG F1 W03

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Matt Somers
Matt Somers
179
Joined: 19 Mar 2009, 11:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

This is all part of the problem with the mainstream media as I've pointed out on twitter (Lots) The Lotus 'Device' is not DDRS as it does not require DRS in order for it to function. The new Mercedes piece is a similar concept to the Lotus device and will reduce drag on the rear wing. Perfect plausible that both systems caused be used in tandem IMO
Catch me on Twitter https://twitter.com/SomersF1 or the blog http://www.SomersF1.co.uk
I tweet tech images for Sutton Images

Timstr
Timstr
8
Joined: 25 Jan 2004, 12:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post


f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Matt Somers wrote:This is all part of the problem with the mainstream media as I've pointed out on twitter (Lots) The Lotus 'Device' is not DDRS as it does not require DRS in order for it to function. The new Mercedes piece is a similar concept to the Lotus device and will reduce drag on the rear wing. Perfect plausible that both systems caused be used in tandem IMO
Agreed, and it may be there, I just can't quite tell from the pictures I've seen. The only reason I can think of not to run them both at the same time is to get more isolated data so as to better evaluate the new system.

It's also a lot of tubing that adds weight to the rear end, I suppose.

Matt Somers
Matt Somers
179
Joined: 19 Mar 2009, 11:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

I've asked Mark (Sutton Images) to try and get me some more pics, but obviously that won't happen today and they may scrap running it for the weekend now.
Catch me on Twitter https://twitter.com/SomersF1 or the blog http://www.SomersF1.co.uk
I tweet tech images for Sutton Images

Timstr
Timstr
8
Joined: 25 Jan 2004, 12:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

The systems are independent.
The one is DDRS and only works on the front wing when the rear flap is open
The other one is a passive F-duct, working on the rear wing.
The sytems don't work together, so I don't see why they would need to take the DDRS off to test the F-duct or vice versa.
Some thin light weight carbon pipes won't make a difference of significance either.

User avatar
Adamski
0
Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 19:47
Location: Hungary

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Timstr wrote:The systems are independent.
The one is DDRS and only works on the front wing when the rear flap is open
The other one is a passive F-duct, working on the rear wing.
The sytems don't work together, so I don't see why they would need to take the DDRS off to test the F-duct or vice versa.
Some thin light weight carbon pipes won't make a difference of significance either.
Yes, that's the way it goes. The thinner wing is a piece for Monza, the new device is just a copy and can be used for every race. Passive F-duct and DDRS can be used parallel, so it's a clever step from Merc. They just need to test the new parts, that is why the two driver drive with different cars.
Michael Schumacher: When you start out in a team, you have to get the teamwork going and then you get something back.

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

The design of the duct outlet is different than Lotus. It is not attached to the bottom of the wing and the nozzle is aimed at the wing surface. This would seem to interact with the wing flow in a different manner.

Could they be routing the the low pressure from under the wing to for some other location?

Could this have something to do with keeping the engine intake plenum in tune over a broader range?

Brian
Last edited by hardingfv32 on 31 Aug 2012, 18:12, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
diego1960
1
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 17:39
Location: Athens, Greece

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Do I see a different engine cover, namely the air intake or am I mistaken? Also, the car looks bad-ass with the Lotus configuration under the rear wing. I hope they use it for Q and R, it would at least show that they try to implement ideas that work.
"Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose." - Ayrton Senna

zyphro
zyphro
1
Joined: 02 May 2012, 16:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Schumacher said there won't be any development stopping this year, it'll go right to the end with some changes made to the car during the next few races.

zyphro
zyphro
1
Joined: 02 May 2012, 16:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Image

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

diego1960 wrote:
Do I see a different engine cover, namely the air intake or am I mistaken? Also, the car looks bad-ass with the Lotus configuration under the rear wing. I hope they use it for Q and R, it would at least show that they try to implement ideas that work.
That will be very unlikely. They barely got any tracktime today; tomorrow they will be very busy with the set up of the car. They cant afford to gamble on it.
#AeroFrodo

elf341
elf341
5
Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 19:31

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Agreed the W03 looks seriously good from that pic. If only the car was as fast as it is good in looks.

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Well seeing the duct not connected to the rear wing just raises more questions.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Thought it was against the rules to do so?
Honda!

Timstr
Timstr
8
Joined: 25 Jan 2004, 12:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Owen.C93 wrote:Well seeing the duct not connected to the rear wing just raises more questions.
I don't think the assembly is finished.
They' wee likely testing the impact on cooling and aero.