"I know my car very well, so it's very rare that I get it wrong. And if I do it's only a little bit and I can still manage it.
"But this was the worst it has ever been set up, and I was really shocked that I had done that.
"I hoped it wasn't my fault, but fortunately the guys did a lot of analysis after the race and found our that we had a failure on part of the rear suspension, so that's comforting."
When quizzed on the exact nature of the problem, Hamilton added: "It's not a suspension failure, because I could still drive with it.
"There was just a part that helps the balance and when you set it up it should react in one way but it didn't do that.
"I'm happy that we found something, so it won't be a problem for this weekend."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103277
Not buying that for some reason.“At around lap 21 Lewis felt what he thought was a mechanical balance change with the car,” said Neale. “Fortunately that was probably an aerodynamic balance change as a result of debris somewhere - probably pick-up of rubber debris, either on the front wing or around the front floor somewhere.
“He ran four laps with a car that had a very forward balance, which made it very difficult to control, and then it cleared. So whatever was on the car let go and Lewis came on the radio and said it felt like the car had come to life and he could drive properly again.”
So I brought the question upon a certain esteemed colleague of ours, who shall remain namelessMiguel wrote:I'm sure if Ciro were between us he could give us a better link with more references about structure, mictrostructure, tribology and all that stuff. However, I was happy enough with that search result.
Anonymous wrote:Well, as I told you, wisdom points to say "I don't know" when you don't know. I have no idea.
Grip depends on surface roughness more than on the age of pavement, although age comes in a close second place. Age effect depends on hardness of aggregates (rocks). So, I have no idea.
There is a simple test to measure skid resistance of asphalt, unless we can find those test numbers (that you run as a matter of routine when resurfacing a race track) then that question is unanswerable.
Of course, you could find before/after pictures to answer "generally" (which means you are speculating and your answer is worth little). If you see the same texture, then more grip. If the texture is more closed (smaller stones), is anybodies guess. If the texture is more open (bigger pores/larger stones) then definitely, more grip.
Usually you are careful not to change texture as more grip means more tyre wear. Nowadays this is a balance that is bringing white hairs to many team tyre expert's heads.
A part of the larger grip of new asphalt comes from the asphaltenes/maltenes issue: asphaltenes are long polymers, maltenes are shorter. UV radiation (sun light) breaks asphaltenes in asphalt and convert them into maltenes. Asphaltenes are stickier, so older asphalt offers you less grip.
Dust also embeds itself into asphalt diminishing grip (if dust comes from clay, but you could have sand dust in dry/cold places that would increase grip).
However the largest effect on grip, after the breakup of asphalt through sunlight damage, comes from a smoother surface (this could be more important than anything else): the less bumps and jumps you have, the larger grip you have (and much better acceleration) because the suspension is not working. Have you seen how the wheels move on Korea's kerbs? That.