Silly Season 2012/2013

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

It makes no sense to have Vettel at Ferrari 2014, especially since Alonso is there to 2016, but everyone I talk to in the paddock is adamant this is the case. It goes against Ferrari's lead/support driver ethos, and given the rule changes it will probably see Newey building a good car.

But then again if Ferrari has an empty seat for 2014, why not sign their own protege Sergio Perez for the drive?

If he does, Mark will probably be retained for continuity, and perhaps a new guy filling the RBR spot, who I suspect will come through the RBR young driver program. I don't think Hamilton will leave Merc for Red Bull, as long as he is with Simon Fuller - Mercedes is a much more marketable brand, especially given Lewis' identity as a racing driver (as opposed to an endurance athlete). Remember a chap called Beckham who moved to this team called LA Galaxy? Simon Fuller.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

I will be very surprised to see Vettel alongside Alonso at Ferrari. At the moment, Massa is the perfect team mate for Fernando and the decision to keep him for 2013 I think is a good one and maybe he can stay even beyond 2013 if he cracks it and makes a good season next year.
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
ArchAngel
2
Joined: 15 Feb 2010, 11:22

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Amazing how fickle fortunes can be and how quick it can change. Prior to the winter break, it was pretty much a majority consensus that MAS is already a dead-man-walking at Ferrari and MSC is already certain about driving for another year at Merc. And despite KOB's Japanese podium, it seems increasingly likely that he'll still lose his Sauber seat for 2013.

VET to Ferrari in 2014? I would've thought that would only be possible if LdM wanted to push off ALO out of the team a'la MSC-2006.

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

With today's confirmation of Massa staying at Ferrari in 2013, the top teams have their seats filled.
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
spadeflush
2
Joined: 21 Feb 2011, 12:28
Location: United States

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Happy Birthday Iceman! He'll announce his 2013 plans today. Expecting no surprises, or should we?
Forza Michael. Forza Jules

RB7ate9
RB7ate9
2
Joined: 13 Jul 2011, 03:03

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

spadeflush wrote:Happy Birthday Iceman! He'll announce his 2013 plans today. Expecting no surprises, or should we?
After all that's been done, it would be the most foolish thing in the world for Lotus not to offer Raikkonen all the ice-cream he could ever want. And promise to minimize interviews to 2 minutes throughout 2013, per race weekend.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

LHamilton wrote:BBC seems confident that Vettel will sign for Ferrari in 2014. They are refering to "Sources inside Ferrari". Where does that leave Red Bull, if that were to happen?
The Vettel/Ferrari rumors are likely to be a negotiation ploy of the Vettel management to earn him more money. It doesn't make sense for him to swap. Not if he can drive a Newey designed car at Red Bull. Adrian's superiority really comes into play when the rules are more dynamic and not as static as they are now. So 2014 it will be even more important to sit in his car and I don't believe that Ferrari will pry him away from Red Bull. They simply have nothing that would lure him away from England. And Ferrari will never again repeat what they did with John Barnard in the nineties.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:The Vettel/Ferrari rumors are likely to be a negotiation ploy of the Vettel management to earn him more money.
Vettel IIRC does his own management. Just adding on, not saying it's not possible. I personally don't think it's what's happening, given that Montezemolo a while back also mentioned Vettel (when asked whether he would sign Perez) but yeah.

But LHamilton's question is interesting. As a pure what-if, though, Red Bull would be in a quandary. I don't believe Webber to be good enough to fend off Alonso or Vettel potentially at Ferrari, despite the fact that he would probably be in a superior Red Bull. I don't imagine the Toro Rosso boys would either, leaving them in a very big quandary.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

raymondu999 wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:The Vettel/Ferrari rumors are likely to be a negotiation ploy of the Vettel management to earn him more money.
Vettel IIRC does his own management. Just adding on, not saying it's not possible. I personally don't think it's what's happening, given that Montezemolo a while back also mentioned Vettel (when asked whether he would sign Perez) but yeah.

But LHamilton's question is interesting. As a pure what-if, though, Red Bull would be in a quandary. I don't believe Webber to be good enough to fend off Alonso or Vettel potentially at Ferrari, despite the fact that he would probably be in a superior Red Bull. I don't imagine the Toro Rosso boys would either, leaving them in a very big quandary.
I honestly expect the reason RedBull didn't want LH was because they had two well established drivers already, not because of any issue with him. I fully expect they would chase after him if SV left.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Yes, but I don't think it would happen.

Firstly it would mean reneging on his Merc deal, which would - after his adamant statements that he is at Mercedes for the long run to help them out of the doldrums - make him look like an absolute tit.

Secondly, in my view Mercedes is much more marketable with Lewis Hamilton, especially given the fact that Lewis is a racing driver (and not an endurance athlete). I believe that marketability is a large portion of the reason Fuller hooked Lewis up with Mercedes.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Well, the announcement regarding Kimi was made today, but it's not about what we were expecting...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk1GnB331WQ[/youtube]
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

ScottB
ScottB
4
Joined: 17 Mar 2012, 14:45

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Yes, but I don't think it would happen.

Firstly it would mean reneging on his Merc deal, which would - after his adamant statements that he is at Mercedes for the long run to help them out of the doldrums - make him look like an absolute tit.

Secondly, in my view Mercedes is much more marketable with Lewis Hamilton, especially given the fact that Lewis is a racing driver (and not an endurance athlete). I believe that marketability is a large portion of the reason Fuller hooked Lewis up with Mercedes.
Red Bull is a massive global brand too however.

Lewis could well have performance clauses in his contract, he'd be a fool if not!


I don't get this Vettel to Ferrari story at all, why would Seb commit himself to moving in 2014, the first year of the new regs with no idea of how good a car Ferrari will be able to make, or even how good an engine! If he wanted to move on, and by the end of his deal he could be a 3 or even 4 time World Champion, so he may well fancy a new challenge, why not wait to see who is in the best shape? Plus he would no doubt have Mclaren, Ferrari and maybe even Mercedes chasing his signature and driving up his wages.

If he does leave, I wonder how much longer Red Bull would stay in the sport... They are so tied into having him in the team, there would be no obvious replacement whatsoever, Alonso would be nearing the end of his career, Button could already be gone, ditto Mark Webber, Hamilton we could assume would be secure at Merc. There's no sign of someone as good as Vettel coming through the RB Driver Programme... Would they stay? Or more to the point could they keep people like Newey? Would he hang around to keep designing likely the best car in the field if it was being driven by Vergne and Ricciardo?

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Hamilton moving to Mercedes was not about imminent success. I don't share the opinion he was led down the garden path by Simon Fuller's XIX entertainment either.
2013 is pretty much written off for Hamilton being a WDC. It would be a miraculous turn around akin to that of the Brawn GP 2009 season were it to happen.
Hamilton moving to Mercedes is all about 2014, where I believe he would stipulate some performance clauses commencing that year.

2014 turbo's and new regulation's which alter some of the aero rules to try balance over dependence on aerodynamics, particularly the front wing, which is being reduced in width from 1800mm to 1650mm.

But there is also another interesting development that could address Mercedes powered teams and their sometimes hit and miss record with Pirelli tyres.
This is sourced from Somer's F1.
2014 will provide the first stepping stone in a tyre manufacturer being able to design a tyre that doesn’t favour one engine manufacturer / chassis design over another. This is because the new rules mean that the engine manufacturers place the engine mountings in the same positions and the chassis themselves will have a ‘spec’ position/arrangement in which the engine fits. This leaves scope for engines to be transferred from one chassis to another.
So when you add it all up, Hamilton made the wrong decision for 2013, but in 2014 there is potential for him to be able challenge.
JET set

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

FoxHound wrote:But there is also another interesting development that could address Mercedes powered teams and their sometimes hit and miss record with Pirelli tyres.
IMO Mercedes engines' struggle this year with Pirelli tyres have not been because of mass distribution but more of the torque output. There was talk a while back that Mercedes' more hefty power punch in the midrange revs were causing more slip.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: Silly Season 2012/2013

Post

Yes, I have read this too.

I believe Ferrari have an issue with it, but not as evident as Mercedes. Will Pirelli re-adjust for this I wonder.
JET set