In the stop-and-start saga of the Grand Prix of America, it now appears Formula 1 race cars will not be roaring through the streets of Weehawken and West New York after all, at least not in 2013.
An official announcement is expected today, but sources told The Star Ledger Thursday the race, tentatively scheduled for June, has been postponed because local organizers haven’t raised enough sponsorship money and are behind in obtaining permits needed to alter local streets that will make up the 3.2-mile race course.
"Some of it is construction issues," said one source who asked not to be named because he was not at liberty to discuss the matter publicly. The sponsors are still hoping to stage the event sometime in 2014, the source said.
F1 events cost can cost $100 million or more to stage, including franchise fees, construction work and other costs.
The New Jersey race, formally known as the Grand Prix of America at Port Imperial, was tentatively scheduled for June 16 and was one of 20 races on tap for next year.
The race’s local sponsor is a consortium headed by former YES Network CEO and retired part-time racer Leo Hindery Jr.
Steve Sigmund, a spokesman for Hindery’s team, would not discuss whether the race has been postponed.
"We’ll have a statement on it tomorrow," Sigmund said yesterday.
Word that the race would not take place in June, as scheduled, was first reported Thursday by the Jersey Journal and posted on nj.com, the online home for both the Jersey Journal and The Star-Ledger.
Neither Weehawken Mayor Richard Turner nor West New York Mayor Felix Roque returned calls from The Star-Ledger.
Hindery and Gov. Chris Christie announced last October that the race would be run along a 3.2-mile circuit through Weehawken and West New York, with the Manhattan skyline as a backdrop. F1’s biggest star, two-time reigning world champion Sebastian Vettel of Germany, helped fuel excitement when made several test runs along the course. F1 racing involves low-slung, single-occupant, ultra-sophisticated cars traveling at over 200 mph.
Concerns over whether the race would actually happen began to surface last month when the head of Formula One, British billionaire Bernie Ecclestone, told a racing journalist that Hindery’s team had missed several deadlines and no longer had a franchise agreement to run the New Jersey race.
But Hindery’s team played up news that the New Jersey race had been included on the Formula One 2013 calendar as ratified by the World Motor Sport Council, F1’s sanctioning body. Doubts remained, however, because Grand Prix of America was the only race among the scheduled events for 2013 to be accompanied by an asterisk, indicating it was yet to be confirmed.
Christian Sylt, author of the F1 trade guide Formula Money, told The Star-Ledger in an email yesterday that Ecclestone had expressed doubts about the race’s prospects as recently as this week.
"I had lunch with Ecclestone on Tuesday," Sylt said, referring to a signing ceremony for his latest book, "Though the Eyes of Formula 1." "And the topic of New Jersey came up. He confirmed that the organizers are well behind schedule but said that it is still theoretically possible for the race to take place in 2013 if they get an investor.
"The crucial point to make here is that, from Ecclestone’s comments, it is clear that the organizers do not have enough funding to complete the project, which would directly contradict the statements from them and Governor Christie," Sylt wrote.
When Gov. Chris Christie announced news of the Formula One race last October, he said the economic impact would be akin to the towns hosting the Super Bowl. Officials expected the three-day event to attract 100,000 visitors and generate $100 million in economic activity.
The local sponsors went to great lengths promoting the event, including making promotional videos.
Earlier this month, Christie said Hindery had assured him the race was "absolutely happening." Christie’s office did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday's developments.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss