http://www.f1-photo.com/F1-ArchivesPup wrote:To those of you who are providing actual answers to the question at hand, as opposed to snidely deriding the person who asked it: thanks, it's a welcome surprise.
I'm surprised. Did not expect that many old photos available digitally.mzivtins wrote:To answer the OP, you can buy hi res prints /digital copies from Rainers collection on getty, his has been photographing F1 for some 40 years, just look through these 300+ moncao pictures going back years and years.... astonishing!
http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/Search/Sea ... &rt=Monaco
Raptor22 wrote:radomer wrote:I would like to know where I can find HIGH RES photos of formula one. I have many of the new era (2009-2012) and I would like to find many photos of 70's , 80's and early 90's. I found some on the google but I want more. I guess there are millions of them but I dont know where to find them.
Is there a way? A site? I mean a link to download? A tor-rent or share ? I need them to be more than 1000x700 in average. Please tell me
You do realise that High res digital photography is really something thats only come along in the last 10 yrs...
Everything before then was on 35mm film....
You're going to have to buy prints from Sutton Images and scan them in. These will no way have anywhere near the quality of getting a digital photograph in RAW or JPG ascaned from the negative.
Does the DVD say who it was and where or when?wrcsti wrote:Found this on an old jeremy clarkson DVD and just had to make it a gif. Ive never seen or heard of this incident before
http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/other/g ... dbeada.gif
That's Manfred Winkelhock in nurburgringwrcsti wrote:Found this on an old jeremy clarkson DVD and just had to make it a gif. Ive never seen or heard of this incident before
http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/other/g ... dbeada.gif
35mm is about the equivaent of 25megapixels.....Raptor22 wrote:radomer wrote:I would like to know where I can find HIGH RES photos of formula one. I have many of the new era (2009-2012) and I would like to find many photos of 70's , 80's and early 90's. I found some on the google but I want more. I guess there are millions of them but I dont know where to find them.
Is there a way? A site? I mean a link to download? A tor-rent or share ? I need them to be more than 1000x700 in average. Please tell me
You do realise that High res digital photography is really something thats only come along in the last 10 yrs...
Everything before then was on 35mm film....
Nope, not even close. The only digital cameras that can capture low light photos that are at best decent compared to film have only come along in the last 5 years or so, and they cost a grip. It'll be quite a while before DSLR sensors reach the dynamic range of film without serious compromises. Low light capability is only getting pretty good here lately, low light photos that are taken on film were better 50 years ago than they are today. Digital sensors and cameras are faster at seeing results, not necessarily better. Especially in low light.beelsebob wrote:Uhhhh, right... You realise that current DSLRs can already capture a greater dynamic range than any film available well... ever?mzivtins wrote:1985 monaco grand prix, notice the dynamic range, the organic feel. Nothing by todays standards comes even close, maybe 5 years more DSLR development and we will have this level of dynamic range:
The image you linked I would bet pretty heavily was not actually taken with a camera but painted/drawn/illustrated in some way. If it was taken with a camera, has had significant amounts of post production done on it.
Film is roughly 14 stops of dynamic range, modern high end dslr's will shoot 14 stops or more just fine.mzivtins wrote:My closing part:
1985 monaco grand prix, notice the dynamic range, the organic feel. Nothing by todays standards comes even close, maybe 5 years more DSLR development and we will have this level of dynamic range:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ ... ificationsRaptor22 wrote:The translation from negative to digital media is purely dependant on the negative scanner resolution. I merely said that for the laymen, the units available did not provide good enough resolution. Industrial negative scanners did and still have excellent resolution but at GBP10,000-00 I'm not exactly going to leave one laying about the study...!
Really? I may as well stop shooting in raw then since I'm not gaining anything according to you.strad wrote:You can "push" film in developing,,,can't do that with digital