I think we can draw conclussions about the nose cone when the car's taken two hits to the outside edge of the front wing.siskue2005 wrote:i dont know how we can draw conclusions from a car which has taken two hits on its front
+100beelsebob wrote:I think we can draw conclussions about the nose cone when the car's taken two hits to the outside edge of the front wing.siskue2005 wrote:i dont know how we can draw conclusions from a car which has taken two hits on its front
No, it shows us that the weight of a front wing is significantly less force on the nose cone than the force of a mechanic trying to wrestle it out of a set of tight mounting brackets. It also shows that when no twisting force is applied, no twisting occurs.siskue2005 wrote:haha, now i have spotted something just now!!
See the pic below its taken just before the pitstop
you can clearly see the mechanic who brings the new nose to replace
and look how he is carrying it around! he is holding the nose cone camera mount BUT it is intact!
which shows us that after running throught the DRS marker the nose cone and mount failed in vettel's car
it has clearly hit the left sided mount, which would have ripped of its supportbeelsebob wrote:I think we can draw conclussions about the nose cone when the car's taken two hits to the outside edge of the front wing.siskue2005 wrote:i dont know how we can draw conclusions from a car which has taken two hits on its front
AnthonyG wrote:I don't believe the wing pilons are attached to that flexible material, but to the crash structure itself.