Red Bull RB8 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Obviously it's a component that would be very sensitive to surround airflow/heat/vibration, so not entirely surprising that it's okay in other installations.

User avatar
Intego
10
Joined: 01 Apr 2010, 16:35

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

According to AMuS it was the bearing of the rotor.
"Posts targeted only at expressing favouritism or dislike towards people are treated as spam. They can hence be deleted without notice and could invoke a warning to the poster." f1technical forum rules

aral
aral
26
Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 22:49

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.

Red Bull have had FOUR failures. Two for Vettel in races, one in practice. And one for Webber in race.

Lotus have also had failures in testing, as have Caterham.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

gilgen wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.

Red Bull have had FOUR failures. Two for Vettel in races, one in practice. And one for Webber in race.

Lotus have also had failures in testing, as have Caterham.
Actually - the R30 Pirelli uses as test mule has had quite a fair share of failures. Have Renault been using that as an on-track dyno?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

raymondu999 wrote:From the article, it sounds like basically they made modifications and fixes to the 2012-spec alternators (which, let's not forget - was reliable all the way from Melbourne to Valencia, and then Valencia to Monza) and they're fielding those. Not any special designs AFTER the failures.
Yes, it sounds to me like the other cars that use Renault engines used the new spec alternators in Austin. No problems from them so RBR feel like its the best way to go.

User avatar
Intego
10
Joined: 01 Apr 2010, 16:35

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

They more feel like they don't have 2011 specs any more ... :wink:
"Posts targeted only at expressing favouritism or dislike towards people are treated as spam. They can hence be deleted without notice and could invoke a warning to the poster." f1technical forum rules

ziggy
ziggy
11
Joined: 19 Nov 2012, 22:05

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Hi. It was mentioned by Renault that the alternators suffered in low RPM corners
here:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/102454

Ok, its logical, in the low RPM range less current is produced by the alternator.

http://www.mclarenelectronics.com/Produ ... e%20100Amp

Just look on the graph.

As I'm understanding the article, the alternator suffered because of overcurrent. Either Renault went over the limit with the new alternators or the car is simply demanding more current than the ALT produces. There were some talkings about Red bull using separate tanks for cooling fluids and oil, so they can pump the fluids all over the car, just where they want the additional weight. Those pumps could draw too much current in low RPM.

Cheers

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Interesting thought ziggy and well done for thinking of a completely new cause for the problems - and for supplying backup data to go with it. If I knew more about that stuff and could verify it's plausible I'd +1. Does anyone know if this is conceivable?
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

Sevach
Sevach
1079
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.
Isn't it 3 for Red Bull now, Vettel=Valencia, Monza. Webber=USA

ziggy
ziggy
11
Joined: 19 Nov 2012, 22:05

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Cam wrote:Interesting thought ziggy and well done for thinking of a completely new cause for the problems - and for supplying backup data to go with it. If I knew more about that stuff and could verify it's plausible I'd +1. Does anyone know if this is conceivable?
Thanks.

Only Renault powered cars can run these separate tanks because of engine reliability or cooling issues and only Renault powered cars suffered from that failure, even Caterham. Sorry can't find the link right now.

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

New RW for the USGP

Image

User avatar
Joie de vivre
2
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 10:12

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

It's interesting how they quickly adapt upgrades by others (ie. sauber exhaust). Deffo less time than Merc's coanda exhaust.

McMrocks
McMrocks
32
Joined: 14 Apr 2012, 17:58

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

fortunately the Brazilian track has not as much slow corners as the CotA

User avatar
Intego
10
Joined: 01 Apr 2010, 16:35

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Joie de vivre wrote:It's interesting how they quickly adapt upgrades by others (ie. sauber exhaust). Deffo less time than Merc's coanda exhaust.
Ya, would be interesting to know their experience with the DRD from YDT. I wouldn't be surprised if they were the first (along with Sauber) to make it work properly.
"Posts targeted only at expressing favouritism or dislike towards people are treated as spam. They can hence be deleted without notice and could invoke a warning to the poster." f1technical forum rules

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

McMrocks wrote:fortunately the Brazilian track has not as much slow corners as the CotA
What does this have to do with the RB8?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法