I think it is the other way around.
McLaren has achieved 25% average over much much longer period (5x races compared to RB) which is more difficult to achieve and sustain.
Red Bull to launch RB9 on 3 February
Red Bull will unveil its new RB9 chassis during a presentation at its Milton Keynes factory on Sunday 3 February. The World Champions, who claimed a third successive Constructors' title last season, will be present at the opening pre-season test.
"The RB9 will be unveiled on Sunday 3 February in Milton Keynes ahead of the first test in Jerez," the team explained via Twitter on Thursday. "More details to follow."
Red Bull joins McLaren, Force India and Sauber in announcing a launch date for its 2013 contender. McLaren is set to be the first team to reveal its new car at Woking on 31 January, with Force India following on 1 February and Sauber one day later.
The first pre-season test takes place at the Circuito de Jerez from 5-8 February.
Is it really needed to post this in every topic?KATO wrote:We Allready know this but it's on the Website.. The luanch dates for the team and other teams..
http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/ ... 14188.html
I wonder what Lotus will think if RedBull ditch their ramp/tunnel.beelsebob wrote:So, we're now at McLaren up and over 3, Red Bull Tunnel 1. Will red bull change their mind on which is more optimal I wonder?
Lotus ramp isn't same like Red Bull, it's combination of Mclaren and Red Bull exaust, it's kind of unique on their ways.RicerDude wrote:I wonder what Lotus will think if RedBull ditch their ramp/tunnel.beelsebob wrote:So, we're now at McLaren up and over 3, Red Bull Tunnel 1. Will red bull change their mind on which is more optimal I wonder?
McLaren wasn't pretty fast the entire year. There was a period in the year that McLaren was really slow in fact, struggled to get into the top 10 in quali. Red Bull never had a lull like that and were more consistently fast.Huntresa wrote:But it was also needed tho, i mean Mclaren car was pretty fast during the entire year and they only did a major upgrade which was the germany upgrade, but Red Bull had to not do 1 major but pretty much put on the stuff they got at every race.raymondu999 wrote:My pont is that RBR, IMO - were spending more effort in the last stretch of 2012, compared to their rivals. While others were only upgrading wings and small parts, Red Bull were bringing out new sidepods etc. The scale of the upgrades from other top teams was far smaller.
I cant remember McLaren struggling to get in the top 10. They had a small dip but were pretty much fastest over the whole yearTamburello wrote:McLaren wasn't pretty fast the entire year. There was a period in the year that McLaren was really slow in fact, struggled to get into the top 10 in quali. Red Bull never had a lull like that and were more consistently fast.Huntresa wrote:But it was also needed tho, i mean Mclaren car was pretty fast during the entire year and they only did a major upgrade which was the germany upgrade, but Red Bull had to not do 1 major but pretty much put on the stuff they got at every race.raymondu999 wrote:My pont is that RBR, IMO - were spending more effort in the last stretch of 2012, compared to their rivals. While others were only upgrading wings and small parts, Red Bull were bringing out new sidepods etc. The scale of the upgrades from other top teams was far smaller.
I doubt it. Remember how McLaren went snow plough in 2010-2011, but Williams ditched it?RicerDude wrote:I wonder what Lotus will think if RedBull ditch their ramp/tunnel.beelsebob wrote:So, we're now at McLaren up and over 3, Red Bull Tunnel 1. Will red bull change their mind on which is more optimal I wonder?
I only remember a couple of races where McLaren were clearly behind Red Bull on pace. Otherwise they were competitive or quicker on pace. Mind you reliability wasn't too great.Tamburello wrote:McLaren wasn't pretty fast the entire year. There was a period in the year that McLaren was really slow in fact, struggled to get into the top 10 in quali. Red Bull never had a lull like that and were more consistently fast.Huntresa wrote:But it was also needed tho, i mean Mclaren car was pretty fast during the entire year and they only did a major upgrade which was the germany upgrade, but Red Bull had to not do 1 major but pretty much put on the stuff they got at every race.raymondu999 wrote:My pont is that RBR, IMO - were spending more effort in the last stretch of 2012, compared to their rivals. While others were only upgrading wings and small parts, Red Bull were bringing out new sidepods etc. The scale of the upgrades from other top teams was far smaller.
It's amazing how short memories can be.raymondu999 wrote:I only remember a couple of races where McLaren were clearly behind Red Bull on pace. Otherwise they were competitive or quicker on pace. Mind you reliability wasn't too great.