Check who was postingraymondu999 wrote:huh? The episode hasn't aired yet, has it?n smikle wrote:All we know is that in similar conditions, Hamilton is 1.1 seconds faster than Vettel in a reasonably priced car.
It's probably a few tenths at the very most because the exit is so wide, if he had of cut the left part of the corner on entry then he would have greatly reduced the huge weight transfer and gained much more time.Mandrake wrote:Check who was postingraymondu999 wrote:huh? The episode hasn't aired yet, has it?n smikle wrote:All we know is that in similar conditions, Hamilton is 1.1 seconds faster than Vettel in a reasonably priced car.
Just a Fan you probably didn't read any other post in this thread right? Cutting Hammerhead the way Hamilton did benefits you all the way to the second to last corner, you will carry more speed for that whole passage. This is more than just a couple of tenths
Since when do we all know that? A lot of things people "know" turn out to be bullshit.Juzh wrote:1:42,9 we all know no one is faster than others by that amount so something fishy must be going on. Which wouldnt be supprising tbh.
Would he? How are you establishing how much the car contributes?Juzh wrote:If he'd really be that fast he'd have 3 titles under his bag by now instead of vettel.
His reaction, getting a photo for twitter seems to suggest that he believes it to be true. The fact that he was pretty much as quick in the wet as the others in the dry also suggests that may well be possible.JimClarkFan wrote:I've always felt Hamilton was the fastest 1 lapper out there, but even I was surprised by that time.
If true =D> .
i dont know kimi was always for me number one, hamilton second one. And i still belive that, Kimi time in Top gear on wet was one second faster then Webber in same condition, also best time in wet conditions. Others did drived on dry track, and you need to count that it was for Hamilton second time.JimClarkFan wrote:I've always felt Hamilton was the fastest 1 lapper out there, but even I was surprised by that time.
If true =D> .
Haha loved that."look at that didn't even cut the corner"
The cars he's had since 2008 are not his fault, but what is troubling is what happened to him in 2007 and 2008 when did have the car. In 2007 you can forgive him a little because of his inexperience and Raikkonen's relentless job in the last few races, but in 2008 he should have won the championship by a long, long way. As Schumacher said at the time, had he not won the championship in 2008 it would have reflected very badly on him despite his otherwise obvious talent.beelsebob wrote:Would he? How are you establishing how much the car contributes?
