Team: Bob Bell (TD), Aldo Costa (ED), Geoff Willis (Technology Director), Andrew Shovlin (CRE), Simon Cole (CTE), Ron Meadows (SD), Matthew Deane (CM), Ross Brawn (TP), Nick Fry (CEO), Toto Wolff (Exec Director), Andy Cowell (MD of powertrain),
Drivers: Nico Rosberg (9), Lewis Hamilton (10) Team name: Mercedes AMG Petronas
A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
You can safely bet that the 5 element wing added quite a bit of performance as it altered the setup possibilities of the entire car. With both drivers still saying there's understeer we may see W04 raked forward a bit more which enlarges the capabilities of the coanda skirt enlarging the side walls of the diffuser. So the back end immediately controls what the front end is capable of and for the foreseeable past MB have been hampered by their back end, but this apparently does not seem to be the case now. If MB's larger issue is making the front end balanced to the more stable rear then that's a good problem to have.
Some have said the back end was a bit uneasy during corner exit but one also must remember that this style of exhaust is more stable under braking rather than acceleration whereas the Red Bull ramp exhaust is give versa. So just because Nico or Lewis must act gingerly on the accel pedal out of a corner doesn't overly concern me with this exhaust arrangement.
Ferraripilot wrote:You can safely bet that the 5 element wing added quite a bit of performance as it altered the setup possibilities of the entire car. With both drivers still saying there's understeer we may see W04 raked forward a bit more which enlarges the capabilities of the coanda skirt enlarging the side walls of the diffuser. So the back end immediately controls what the front end is capable of and for the foreseeable past MB have been hampered by their back end, but this apparently does not seem to be the case now. If MB's larger issue is making the front end balanced to the more stable rear then that's a good problem to have.
Some have said the back end was a bit uneasy during corner exit but one also must remember that this style of exhaust is more stable under braking rather than acceleration whereas the Red Bull ramp exhaust is give versa. So just because Nico or Lewis must act gingerly on the accel pedal out of a corner doesn't overly concern me with this exhaust arrangement.
They have updated the exhaust solution and I have to say, it looks pretty good. A bit like the MP4/27. It will add downforce for sure.
dren wrote:That looks like something on the drive shaft cover. Both sides have it. Underneath is the pull rod.
Correct. It looks as if the top is a duct whilst the bottom hanging bit is perhaps a airspeed measuring device? I've no idea what it is really, no one else is using one.
The left arrow points to a part of the brake cooling fins. The right arrow points to concave face of the diffuser - the bit where it rises quickly from the floor to the diffuser roof. Here it faces towards the front of the car so we're not getting the reflection that we see on the upper face so it appears dark.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.
I have a question regarding the DRD. It sounds to me a lot like a passive F-Duct. Mercedes was running one in 2010, so I wonder whether that could give them an edge here. I seem to remember Brawn saying that it was a mistake to put so much effort into the passive F-Duct, because it took them the whole season to make it work properly. That could be beneficial now however.
AFAIK, the passive F-Duct was all within the rear wing of the car, so there is a fundamental difference to the DRD. But I would imagine that the hardest part is to tune the device so that it's activated at precisely the point you need it. But the same problem applies to the passive F-Duct. So could Mercedes' experience with the passive F-Duct help them now, or is this so different that they'll have to start from scratch again? Because if they can't fall back on their old data, I really wonder if this DRD is worth the effort as nobody but Lotus seems to think it's a path worth exploring...