Pat Fry Interview:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lzkzp14Qyto[/youtube]
The teams are told which cameras will be used on their cars for TV during the race weekend. Teams therefore know they don't need to bother hooking up the nose camera's if for example they have been told the T camera will be used on their car and no others.otbsti wrote:Camera connection could make sense, but 2 things come to mind: 1. They aren't running any cameras in there during testing. They are dummy pods for aero purposes I thought. 2. Why would it be a cable that has to be un-plugged carefully by a mechanic ? Everyone else has cameras on the nose cone, but they seem to be a quick connect or something similar as they certainly don't carefully unplug and plug them back in during a nose change during a race (for example).
Just throwing it out there... I'm most likely wrong, but I thought it was an interesting set of photos.
raymondu999 wrote:Coefficient - to my knowledge, they're required to have the camera pod winglets there anyways even if there are no cameras installed there for that particular weekend. Ballasted to cover for the camera loss.
Oh you meant not hook up the camera cabling! Apologies. I thought you meant teams wouldn't hook up the redundant camera winglets.Coefficient wrote:raymondu999 wrote:Coefficient - to my knowledge, they're required to have the camera pod winglets there anyways even if there are no cameras installed there for that particular weekend. Ballasted to cover for the camera loss.
Yes thats right, they have to carry dummies in the redundant camara positions. Given that most teams move their forward cameras around for varying aerodynamic effect and that we only occassionally see shots from the front camera's it seems to me that the front cameras are commonly the dummies with the majority of onboard footage coming from the T camera position as this tends to be the favoured shot for the telemetry graphic overlay. This is possibly why we see such rapid nose changes but in F1 it seems odd to have a cable flapping about in the nose which leads me to suspect it is a temporary solution which will become fully integrated before long.
Either it all went horribly wrong, or he purposely backed off in S3. I hope for the latter!PABLOEING wrote:AUTOSPORT Live @autosportlive
Alonso goes green in the first two sectors but his lap unravels in the third and a 1m24.094s is comfortably slower than his today best
"I hope it changes, because if we are in this situation in Melbourne we are going to see something like seven or 10 stops."